I don't think it's a problem at all except if it's someone asking what to buy for christmas 2011 and someone awake that thread and he or she get a bunch of new answers which may not even be read or used because people don't look at the first post.
Den måndagen den 14:e januari 2013 kl. 06:04:57 UTC+1 skrev Iidhaegn: > > So I know people hate the act of thread rezzing (posting to a thread > that's been dead for a while - how long a "while" is varies from forum to > forum: a year or more, a few weeks, 20 minutes...) on various forums, but > what's the general consensus on BGG? (At least as understood by visitors to > this site...) > > I don't understand why people hate thread necromancers. The Internet is > like that. Just because it was posted last year, and whether or not it is > still relevant to YOU, does not mean that some other person stumbling on > said thread can't find relevance in it at a far future date. > > To complicate things even more, people will frequently berate others for > "not using the search function" (regardless how good [or bad] said search > function may be) on topics that have been discussed before, and yet, when > those people post to the ancient threads they sometimes get "instructed" to > "start a new thread." > > It's not really a serious issue, but I am wondering what people on BGG > think. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BGG Down" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/bgg_down/-/XUscLio1kewJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bgg_down?hl=en.
