Appreciate this update. I don't envy Aldie's difficult decisions...

On Sunday, January 13, 2013 6:39:05 PM UTC-7, Maarten wrote:
>
> Yes, the team was working on a new design, and some could even test 
> the beta. However, at some point news and updates simply stopped 
> appearing, and development seemed to stall. It wasn't until a week or 
> two ago that Aldie in a casual and off-hand manner described what had 
> happened: the site design would simply have tacked a different skin 
> onto a MVC-style code base which Aldie had literally grown fed up 
> with. (MVC is ICT-jargon, being an abbreviation for 'model view 
> controller', meaning that you have a DB full of data, and then program 
> various shells which retrieve, modify and present this same data in 
> various ways, depending on the needs of the user and he wants to 
> achieve.) It was not true MVC, it was old, it was grown organically, 
> it was quirky, and it would not have solved what he perceived to be 
> fundamental issues, like for example having crappy support for mobile 
> access to the DB. He was currently in the process of reviewing some 
> 3rd party alternatives to his own MVC-code base so that he would be 
> freed from programming and maintaining the bare MVC-basics, focussing 
> instead on the implementation specifics which would make BGG BGG. And 
> not just on a computer or laptop, but also on a tablet or smartphone 
> or app or whatever. He was also studying ways to offload the 
> generation of the HTML necessary for the user to interact with the 
> website to yet another 3rd party framework, again with the intent of 
> not being burdened (as much) with the basics of this process. Some 
> geeks offered brief suggestions for these quite specialist packages, 
> highlighting various strengths and weaknesses. And that was basically 
> all. 
>
> So, summarising: the redesign we've been hearing about for the better 
> part of two years has been effectively shelved. Aldie is curently 
> looking at a far more radical and fundamental redesign of the website 
> than he had ever planned or envisaged. There is, for the time being, 
> also no longer a date when the job will be finished: there are too 
> many variables and uncertainties to consider, and a lot depends on how 
> easy it is to move important subsystems (like for example the 
> notifications) to these new frameworks. One advantage, though: when 
> Aldie's done, the website will probably be a lot less quirky, and have 
> a lot more consistent interface no matter how you access it. 
>
>
> Maarten 
>
> On Jan 14, 12:26 am, Crokinole Dundee <[email protected]> 
> wrote: 
> > It seems like a while ago, there was talk of a new site redesign. Is 
> this 
> > something in the works? It sure needs it badly. Not to look a gift horse 
> in 
> > the mouth or anything. 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BGG 
Down" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/bgg_down/-/0uNqFGV6tlgJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/bgg_down?hl=en.

Reply via email to