Losing a game or two isn't a huge deal. I thought Imperial Assault did a good job with alternating games to be slightly in favor of the loser of the previous game, but like Andre said, if it keeps going, you're going to be hurting. If your heroes are really good players then go hard all the time, but if you're a stronger player then I'd take it easy a bit so they can get some upgrades or the end game will be less fun for them.
On Monday, September 10, 2018 at 8:54:22 AM UTC-4, André Nordstrand wrote: > > Both Descent and Imperial Assault has a kind of snowballing effect, where > the winning team gets stronger than the losing team. If you win early on as > Empire, you will find it easier later. Also, in my experience, allies are > much stronger than the threat cost the Empire will get as compensation. > > So to answer the question: try to win as often as you can. > > mandag 10. september 2018 02.46.00 UTC+2 skrev Shieldwolf følgende: >> >> So "under siege" is supposed to have 5 control points but my copy of the >> game came with 4. I realized I was missing one but forgot about it by the >> time we started playing. >> As such we only had 4 points in play and the rebles won with one hero >> alive. I'm fine with their victory as it was my own stupid mistake, but I'm >> curious how bad does that hurt the empire in future missions or does it >> really matter. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BGG Down" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/bgg_down. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
