Colegas,
Já está sendo discutido o novo padrão que vai tomar o lugar do "antigo" AACR2.
Deverá ser chamado de RDA: Resource Description and Access e será publicado em 
2008.

Bruno
Biblioteca Mário de Andrade
São Paulo


>From AACR to RDA: Executive Summary

The two international committees who oversee the development of Anglo-American 
Cataloguing Rules (AACR) met in Chicago from April 24-28, 2005 to discuss the 
best way to proceed with the development of a new cataloging code to replace 
AACR2, the current edition of this widely-used standard for library cataloging. 
Increasingly AACR2 is criticized for being too complex, too dependent upon 
outmoded card catalog concepts, and too difficult to apply to new types of 
digital resources.
The Joint Steering Committee for Revision of AACR (JSC) and the Committee of 
Principals for AACR (CoP) discussed feedback received recently from library 
constituencies and other rule-making bodies on a draft of Part 1 of an intended 
new edition of AACR. The two committees reaffirmed the need to develop a new 
code to replace AACR2. However, the feedback was clear that a different 
approach is required than what was represented in the draft of Part 1.
To signify the change in direction, the JSC and CoP have agreed on a new 
working title for the code: RDA: Resource Description and Access.
RDA will be a new content standard for resource description and access designed 
for the digital world. RDA will provide: a more flexible framework for 
addressing the challenges of describing digital resources data that is more 
readily adaptable to newly emerging, more efficient, database structures data 
that is compatible with existing records already in online library catalogs 
because of RDA’s foundations in the principles set by AACR. RDA will be 
designed as an online product for use in a Web environment. It will have the 
following specific features:
Organization around IFLA’s Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records 
(FRBR) and related new data models
Instructions for recording data presented independently of guidelines for data 
display, to provide more flexibility for records used in a variety of online 
environments
More “user-friendly" layout and formatting, with instructions written in 
“plain” English so that the code can be used more easily beyond the library 
world.
In addition to the constituencies formally represented on the JSC and the CoP, 
major stakeholders in the development of RDA include library administrators, 
system developers, metadata communities, MARC format developers and 
international cataloging programs. As RDA is developed, drafts of each section 
of the new standard will be made available for these major stakeholders to 
review, and the developers of RDA will actively seek feedback from all of these 
groups.
The publication of RDA is now planned for 2008.
A more complete report of the meetings of the Joint Steering Committee is 
available at:
http://www.collectionscanada.ca/jsc/0504out.html
Jennifer Bowen,
ALA Representative to the JSC
June 6, 2005


>
> Olá Prof. Murilo e demais membros da lista
>
> Creio mesmo que o AACR esteja com os dias contados. Percebo um excesso de 
> regras que se contradizem, além de minúcias desnecessárias. Há que se 
> considerar também que existem outros códigos nacionais.
>
> O autor do artigo deixou de abordar duas questões importantes relacionadas ao 
> futuro do AACR: a "gestação", pelo grupo de especialistas em catalogação, de 
> um único código de catalogação internacional, já discutido em três 
> oportunidades: 2003, 2004 e no final de 2005, promovido pela IFLA.
>
> Esse código incorporará o modelo conceitual proposto nos FRBR, já aceito, 
> discutido e incorporado por alguns desenvolvedores de software e pela 
> comunidade bibliotecária, não só americana.O modelo propõe uma nova visão 
> sobre os objetos bibliográficos, considerando-os como entidades, dotadas de 
> atributos, nem sempre similares aos campos MARC, ou aos elementos de dados 
> que vemos hoje nos registros, podendo estar dispersos em mais de um campo e 
> subcampo do Formato MARC. As entidades se relacionam entre si, em tipos de 
> relacionamentos também mais amplos que os previstos no AACR e no formato.
>
> Para quem se interessar:
>
> International Meetings of Experts for an International Cataloguing Code 
> (IME-ICC)
> http://www.ddb.de/standardisierung/afs/imeicc_index.htm 2003
> http://www.loc.gov/loc/ifla/imeicc/imeicc2/ 2004
> http://www.loc.gov/loc/ifla/imeicc/ 2005
>
>
> Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records Final Report - FRBR
> http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr.htm
>
> Saudações,
>
> Fernanda Moreno
> Mestranda em Ciência da Informação
> CID/UnB
_______________________________________________
Bib_virtual mailing list
[email protected]
https://listas.ibict.br/mailman/listinfo/bib_virtual

Responder a