That comment predates the splitview by quite a long time, so that shouldn't be relevant.
On Jan 1, 2008, at 5:17 AM, Christiaan Hofman wrote: > OK, that's solved. My layout calculation was right, but the > splitview in the test project was clipped at the bottom. > > Christiaan > > On Jan 1, 2008 1:13 PM, Christiaan Hofman < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Adam, can you explain to me what's wrong with my understanding of the > file view layout? The remark in _recalculateGridSize says that the > test program requires an extra padding at the bottom, as text is > drawing in the padding. However if I look at the code, than I see > that the rowHeight already includes this padding. The extra half > padding is for the top. The fileview in BibDesk indeed does seem to > have a padding too much at the bottom. But not the test program. > What's different? BTW, adding a horizontal scroller in the test > program makes no difference. > > Christiaan > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/_______________________________________________ > Bibdesk-develop mailing list > Bibdesk-develop@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-develop ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-develop mailing list Bibdesk-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-develop
