On 3 Jan 2008, at 1:23 AM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:

>
> On Wednesday, January 02, 2008, at 12:44PM, "Adam R. Maxwell"  
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Wednesday, January 02, 2008, at 12:31PM, "Alexander H.  
>> Montgomery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> It would be helpful to put a cap on the number of records to put
>>> thumbnails in the sidebar (similar to the maximum number of items to
>>> show in the preview window); I accidentally had it open when I
>>> selected my entire bibliography, and had to force-quit.
>>
>> You should not have to force quit.  Thumbnails should only be  
>> rendered if they're visible, or will become visible as you scroll,  
>> so there's already an implicit cap.  Having said that, I made some  
>> significant performance improvements in it this morning.  The web  
>> thumbnails were using a lot of memory, and loads weren't being  
>> canceled correctly.  If you can reproduce a problem in the next  
>> nightly, sample it and let me know.
>
> Okay, don't bother sending samples; I can reproduce the problem.   
> It's mainly due to a major inefficiency in the way the document  
> returns URLs, and just happens to be more noticeable with the web  
> thumbnails.
>
> -- 
> adam

What's the inefficiency? The fact that it recreates the array every  
time it needs a URL?

Christiaan



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bibdesk-develop mailing list
Bibdesk-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-develop

Reply via email to