On 3 Jan 2008, at 1:23 AM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 02, 2008, at 12:44PM, "Adam R. Maxwell" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Wednesday, January 02, 2008, at 12:31PM, "Alexander H. >> Montgomery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> It would be helpful to put a cap on the number of records to put >>> thumbnails in the sidebar (similar to the maximum number of items to >>> show in the preview window); I accidentally had it open when I >>> selected my entire bibliography, and had to force-quit. >> >> You should not have to force quit. Thumbnails should only be >> rendered if they're visible, or will become visible as you scroll, >> so there's already an implicit cap. Having said that, I made some >> significant performance improvements in it this morning. The web >> thumbnails were using a lot of memory, and loads weren't being >> canceled correctly. If you can reproduce a problem in the next >> nightly, sample it and let me know. > > Okay, don't bother sending samples; I can reproduce the problem. > It's mainly due to a major inefficiency in the way the document > returns URLs, and just happens to be more noticeable with the web > thumbnails. > > -- > adam
What's the inefficiency? The fact that it recreates the array every time it needs a URL? Christiaan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-develop mailing list Bibdesk-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-develop