On Wednesday, January 23, 2008, at 12:24PM, "Christiaan Hofman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Is it safe to use the value as the first argument in >OSAtomicCompareAndSwap32, as in OSAtomicCompareAndSwap32(value, 0, >&value) ? And/or should there be a preceding OSMemoryBarrier() ?
It might be safe, but I think it's more clear just to pass in the expected value (since we always ignore the return value, it doesn't much matter anyway). I think it's better to use OSAtomicCompareAndSwap32Barrier() in all cases, though. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-develop mailing list Bibdesk-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-develop
