I'm using BibDesk's Abstract/Annote fields. FYI - I'm collecting my citations with Zotero then exporting them as a Bibtex file and then importing them into BibDesk. The abstracts are coming along with the citations in many cases.
JiHO's answer sort of makes sense. I understand just enough about LaTeX to be dangerous to myself and others. I did try some other styles in BibDesk (plainnat, apalike, etc.) and although the citation format changed, the abstract still came along for the ride. Thanks for the help! greg On Oct 9, at Oct 9 | 9:48, Adam R. Maxwell wrote: > > On Tuesday, October 09, 2007, at 09:43AM, "jiho" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On 2007-October-09 , at 18:07 , greg kise wrote: >>> I've been using BibDesk for a while and have a problem that I cannot >>> solve. >>> >>> When I preview a citation that has an abstract or a note, the >>> citation includes the abstract or note like this: > > JiHO's answer is probably correct, but are you using the "Note" > field, or BibDesk's Abstract/Annote fields? > > -- > adam > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a > browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Bibdesk-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
