On 11 Oct 2007, at 8:00 PM, Ingrid Giffin wrote: > On 10/11/07 11:32 AM, "Adam R. Maxwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> On Thursday, October 11, 2007, at 10:28AM, "Ingrid Giffin" >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I see. I was using coding from the only online information I've >>> been able to >>> find. Is there a good list somewhere of the preferred latex 2e >>> coding? >> >> I recommend <http://noodle.med.yale.edu/latex/essential.pdf>, >> especially if >> you're new to LaTeX or (as in your case) not using it. > > Thank you, that answered a lot of questions. When I use this > coding, I see > that most titles also display more nicely in the reference window. > But items > that use codes like "\&" still show the slash in the reference > window. Not a > big deal, but I wonder why the reference display doesn't translate > those > special characters. > > Ingrid
Parsing any tex would be too far a stretch for bibdesk, tex is far too complex for that and bibdesk is not tex parser. We do a little bit of cleaning and interpreting for display that is not too difficult and fast. Compare the built-in latex preview to see that fully parsing latex is far too slow to be useful. Christiaan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
