On Jan 1, 2008, at 8:53 PM, Michael McCracken wrote: > On Jan 1, 2008 6:39 PM, Adam R. Maxwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Jan 1, 2008, at 6:19 PM, Michael McCracken wrote: >> >>> On Dec 30, 2007 11:31 PM, Adam R. Maxwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>> The file pane is looking really nice - although I was expecting it >>> to >>> auto-size like omniweb's thumbnails. I find that I never want empty >>> horizontal space in the file pane, and thus having a separate slider >>> for the icon size seems redundant. Am I missing something there? >> >> OW has a single column, so it can size thumbnails to that width. The >> file pane is an iPhoto-style grid view like IKImageBrowserView; check >> out the test project for the fileview framework to see what it looks >> like. The original plan was to have it in the bottom pane, where >> zooming is more useful. > > That explains it. So it'd be a big change to make it autosize with > one column?
Yes. I believe it would make more sense to write a new view class using the icon generation/threading/caching. Maybe a subclass, but not enough of the layout is exposed as an API to make that easy, and it would be like killing a gnat with a shotgun in some respects. Have you looked at the code at all? > I do think that'd be better behavior as long as the file pane is along > the right. > (But of course I'm open to having my mind changed) We may have an option of displaying it at the bottom in future, since I don't think that was ever settled. So I see your point, but I'm not terribly enthusiastic about it for various reasons. -- adam ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
