On Monday, February 04, 2008, at 01:12PM, "Ingrid Giffin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On 1/27/08 5:36 PM, "Adam M. Goldstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Jan 27, 2008, at 7:22 PM, Cloy Tobola wrote: >> >>> >>> 1. I understand the change to the Local File column. When that column >>> is set to be very narrow, would it be better to have the number of >>> linked files appear [rather than just a paper clip]? After all, the >>> paperclip already appears in the column at the top. Just a thought. >>> >> >> But then you'd have to look up at the top of the column to see what >> the number was for. There is a links column too, and you'd have to >> distinguish it from that. > >By that rationale, every field in every column should be labeled with its >header; clearly not normal for a column view. > >I too wish the paper clip could be removed from each field. Or, if the >column is made narrow, the paper clip should disappear so that only the >number showed.
I implemented the paperclip cell to have the same behavior as Apple's Mail, so the behavior should be familiar to many users. It gives an immediate visual cue as to the content of that column; title/author/date are typically obvious just from context. Aren't there more important things to complain about? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
