On Tuesday, April 15, 2008, at 02:28PM, "Adam R. Maxwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Tuesday, April 15, 2008, at 02:09PM, "Christiaan Hofman" <[EMAIL >PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>As has been said here many times by now, the old URL fields are not >>supported anymore. They are treated just as string fields. >> >>Again: you should drag to the file icon view in the side pane. > >Depending on the bibliography requirements, that may not be sufficient. If >you're dealing with a type and/or style that requires the URL field to be >printed out, you'll need to copy the link back to the URL field. If you add >those frequently, a script hook that fires on "Add File or URL" might be worth >setting up to copy the link to the URL field. Thinking about this a bit more, maybe it would make sense to copy the first non-file: URL dropped on a reference to the URL field if URL is a required/optional field for that type? I know I'd find the current behavior annoying if I was adding a bunch of web citations. -- adam ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
