On 30 Jan 2009, at 3:39 PM, Simon Spiegel wrote:

>
> On 30.01.2009, at 15:27, Michael McCracken wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Jonas Zimmermann
>> <lis...@jonaszimmermann.de> wrote:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On 29.01.2009, at 15:38, Cloy Tobola wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have a Bibdesk bibliography file that's getting large - 1.1mb  
>>>> with
>>>> 315 sources. (Breaking it into smaller files isn't a good option  
>>>> right
>>>> now.)
>>>>
>>>> Since I use the file (and attached PDFs) from several locations, I
>>>> keep the file (and the auto-filed PDFs) on a WebDAV drive.
>>>>
>>>> That works okay, but it's getting slow. It often takes 2 or 3  
>>>> minutes
>>>> to open the file, and about 90 seconds to save it.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a way to optimize the file so it opens/saves more quickly?
>>>
>>>
>>> The only thing that comes to my mind is using a version control  
>>> system
>>> such as SVN with this setup. So you can work locally on your files  
>>> and
>>> only synchronise when needed. But of course, this opens another huge
>>> bag of problems...
>>
>> If you're used to version control, SVN might make sense. But it's a
>> little overkill - you don't really need history and branching for  
>> this
>> stuff, you just need backup and syncing.
>>
>> I haven't tried it, but it occurs to me that using dropbox might be
>> the best way to solve Cloy's problem: https://www.getdropbox.com/
>>
>> It syncs files between computers but should be much faster than  
>> webDAV
>> since it keeps local copies of the files and synchronizes
>> asynchronously. It also sends minimal diffs - I believe webDAV sends
>> entire file contents for every update.
>>
>> The free account lets you store up to 2GB. If anyone tries this out,
>> please let us know how it works for you.
>
> I use Dropbox quite extensively and I'm very fond of it. Among other  
> things I have my .bib file with >3500 entries and about 300MB of  
> PDFs which are managed by BibDesk on it. This works really nice and  
> is for me so far the best solution to have my different machines in  
> sync. I used unison before but here to disadvantage is that you  
> always have to do the syncing by hand.
>
> There's only one problem, although I'm not sure about it. I think  
> that in some circumstances, PDFs on Dropbox can lose their Skim  
> annotations. As I said, I'm not really sure that this is actually  
> true, since I couldn't reproduce it, but I once lost my annotations  
> (maybe this happened before when I synched with unison). Maybe on of  
> the developers can shed light on this: Could this be problem of  
> Dropbox?

You're sure you can't reproduce? Because they say it's not supported 
<http://www.getdropbox.com/help/6 
 >, and I can't find it yet in their ChangeLogs. Though they are  
working on it <http://wiki.getdropbox.com/FeatureRequests>.

> On a related note: I'm not sure whether I got something wrong, but  
> is it correct that BibDesk will only read Skim annotations in the  
> PDF but not when they are in a seperate .skim file?
>
> simon


No, BibDesk can get skim notes from EAs, PDF bundles, and equally- 
named .skim files.

Christiaan


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Bibdesk-users mailing list
Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users

Reply via email to