On Nov 23, 2009, at 22:21, Nick Illich wrote:

>> About group fields, I went to View->Group Field->Add Field and tried to type 
>> in "Series", but it gave me a warning that says "Invalid Field: The field 
>> "Series" can not be used for groups."
>  
>>  
> 
> Fields containing some kind of title would be useless for field groups. There 
> would just be one group for each item, because titles are generally unique, 
> and they also do not consist of a list of unique words like Keywords.
> If you want to do some matching on a title-like field according to some 
> matching criterium, you should use a smart group, as Adam suggested.
> 
> I'm sorry, I'm a little confused. Why would an entry like 'series' be useless 
> for a field group? For series, it's similar browsing articles in a journal, 
> which listed in the field groups already. Instead, it would be browsing books 
> in a series, right? Am I understanding it correctly?
> 
> Thanks,
> Nick
> 

I'd say that a series is much more like a booktitle. There are generally much 
more articles in a journal than there are books in a series. Therefore series 
are not good for grouping items, as there will be one or at most just a few per 
item.

Christiaan

> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Christiaan Hofman <cmhof...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Nov 23, 2009, at 11:47, Nick Illich wrote:
> 
>> Thanks for all the info Adam and Christiaan! I really appreciate it.
>> 
>> About group fields, I went to View->Group Field->Add Field and tried to type 
>> in "Series", but it gave me a warning that says "Invalid Field: The field 
>> "Series" can not be used for groups."
> 
> Fields containing some kind of title would be useless for field groups. There 
> would just be one group for each item, because titles are generally unique, 
> and they also do not consist of a list of unique words like Keywords.
> 
> If you want to do some matching on a title-like field according to some 
> matching criterium, you should use a smart group, as Adam suggested.
> 
>> The others fields work, such as author (is there a way to link author and 
>> editor in case there is no author?), year, etc.
>> 
> 
> No, that's not supported.
> 
>> I'm sorry, I got the wording wrong about the cite key error. It usually does 
>> it if I try to add more than one PDF and says: "Duplicate Cite Key: One or 
>> more items you added have a cite key which is either already used in this 
>> document. You should provide a unique one." Is there an option to turn off 
>> the warning?
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> Nick
>> 
> 
> No. Things may not work properly when you don't have unique cite keys.
> 
> Christiaan
> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Christiaan Hofman <cmhof...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> On Nov 23, 2009, at 4:21, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
>> 
>> >
>> > On Nov 22, 2009, at 6:52 PM, Nick Illich wrote:
>> >
>> >> One thing I liked about Mendeley, though, was that when I drag one of my 
>> >> PDFs to the program, it gives me a button that allows me to automatically 
>> >> try to retrieve information based on Google Scholar if I type in the 
>> >> title, etc. Is there a way to do something similar in BibDesk?
>> >
>> > Not at present.  If you download or copy e.g., BibTeX or RIS data for that 
>> > citation, though, you can drop it or paste it on the editor window of the 
>> > reference (at least, I think that still works).
>> >
>> >> I've been able to import information from Google Scholar and other sites 
>> >> through BibDesk before, but only if do it before I add a blank entry with 
>> >> a PDF. Is there a way to look up the information after an entry is 
>> >> created (from adding a PDF there)?
>> >
>> > There's code to do this for PubMed based on the PDF contents, but not 
>> > Google Scholar.  I vaguely recall an AppleScript from Brian Helenbrook 
>> > that did something similar with other indexes, but the links on the wiki 
>> > are dead.  You could implement something yourself with AppleScript, I 
>> > think.
>> >
>> >> Also, in recent versions, it gives me a warning whenever I add more than 
>> >> one PDF/blank entries that the cite key is missing. Since I know about it 
>> >> and will add it later, is there an option that will allow me to turn the 
>> >> warning off?
>> >
>> > That sounds odd.  Do you have citekey as part of the autofile naming 
>> > scheme?
>> >
>> 
>> Which / what kind of warning are you talking about?
>> 
>> >> Also, when there is a translator for a book, what field does it go under? 
>> >> I didn't see a translator field, so I created one, but I was just 
>> >> wondering what others in general used for this kind of situation, if 
>> >> there is an option I do not know of.
>> >
>> > You'll have to add your own, since that's not a standard BibTeX field.  
>> > BibLaTeX might define a standard field for it.
>> >
>> >> I also really like being able to view all the keywords on the side pane 
>> >> and browse by those. I was wondering if there were other "browse by" 
>> >> options, in particular I'm interested in browsing by the series title, 
>> >> showing all the volumes of a particular series.
>> >
>> > Absolutely.  See
>> >
>> > http://bibdesk.sourceforge.net/manual/BibDesk%20Help_33.html
>> >
>> > or search for "group" in the help book.
>> >
>> 
>> And you can choose the field to use for the field (keyword) groups using 
>> View > Group Field (or the context menu on the header of those groups).
>> 
>> >> Finally, if my computer fails for some reason and I have to back up all 
>> >> of my data,
>> >
>> > I recommend backing up before the failure :)
>> >
>> >> would the data links between the pdf and bib file remain in place? For 
>> >> instance, if I retrieve a copy of my bibliography file from a source and 
>> >> also a copy of all the pdfs that it had linked to, will the links break 
>> >> or will it automatically know where to find them? Would they have to 
>> >> maintain the same path?
>> >
>> > As long as the relative path from the .bib file to the linked files is the 
>> > same, it will just work.  There are some other details that have been 
>> > discussed in the archives, like this thread:
>> >
>> > http://www.mail-archive.com/bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg03651.html
>> >
>> > regards,
>> > Adam
>> 
>> More generally: either 1. the relative path, 2. the full path or 3. the file 
>> id must remain the same for BibDesk to find the linked file back.
>> 
>> Christiaan
>> 
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
>> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
>> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
>> Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bibdesk-users mailing list
>> Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
>> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus 
>> on 
>> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
>> Crystal Reports now.  
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july_______________________________________________
>> Bibdesk-users mailing list
>> Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
> Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> _______________________________________________
> Bibdesk-users mailing list
> Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
> Crystal Reports now.  
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july_______________________________________________
> Bibdesk-users mailing list
> Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Bibdesk-users mailing list
Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users

Reply via email to