> On 26.01.2010, at 10:50, Daniele Avitabile wrote: >> Also, when I move to a different computer to do some editing, I have the >> same problem. >> >> The alternative seems to be to build up a local copy of the database, >> which kills the main advantage to have a centralised database. >> >> What is your workflow? >> >> Best. >> Daniele
I second what has been said about dropping .aux files on BibDesk and having a central database. Your other question was not really targeted much so far, so I'll chime in: During the last couple of years, a number of approaches for keeping a central .bib-file in sync has been mentioned on this list, including using a versioning repository (CVS, SVN, Git, Mercury, you name it), using various web apps, or using a server based file (on mobileMe/iDisk, some other mounted server via symlink). Personally I use SVN to keep various working copies on home and work machines up to date, which works for me. My AutoFile preferences point to a centralized directory on some server, which has its only downside when I don't have internet access, but that only happens rarely (and most of the times it is plannable, so I just draw a copy of what I need). Stephan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
