Sadly, I think btparse might be wrong to allow this. From bibtex.web: "furthermore, comments may appear anywhere between entries (or before the first or after the last) as long as they contain no |at_sign|s" [1]
Since @comment was an afterthought for scribe compatibility, I'm not sure that it's very well defined or supported. Disallowing @ in group names is might be the safest thing to do. I wonder if bibclean or other parsers accept this? The web code is too painful for me to decipher. [1] http://www.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/biblio/bibtex/distribs/bibtex.web On Oct 11, 2010, at 13:40, Christiaan Hofman wrote: > Strange, bibtex should just ignore anything in a comment, including the "@". > > Christiaan > > On Oct 10, 2010, at 9:10, Adam M. Goldstein wrote: > >> I had a group named >> >> Phil of Science @ Bayes, etc. >> >> and when I BibTeX'ed a file, I got an error. When I removed the @, it worked. >> >> If it would help to see the @comment with the groups information that's in >> my bib file, I can send it. >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
