Hi all,
The AGU journal REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS - as many other AGU journals - offers a
"Export RIS Citation" service. I found that these files contain a DOI field
encoded similar to this
DO - 10.1029/2010RG000345
yet, when I import such a ris file into BibDesk (latest nightly Version 1.5.3
(2069) from 29.Dec.2010) a field 'Do' is generated, not a field 'Doi'. Can
anyone enlighten me where to tackle this problem? Should BibDesk be improved to
make a Doi field instead of the Do field? Should AGU be asked to use a
different encoding?
Thanks for any ideas on this issue.
Regards,
Andreas
ETH Zurich
Prof. Dr. Andreas Fischlin
Systems Ecology - Institute of Integrative Biology
CHN E 21.1
Universitaetstrasse 16
8092 Zurich
SWITZERLAND
[email protected]
www.sysecol.ethz.ch
+41 44 633-6090 phone
+41 44 633-1136 fax
+41 79 221-4657 mobile
Make it as simple as possible, but distrust it!
________________________________________________________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers
to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and,
should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database
without downtime or disruption
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl
_______________________________________________
Bibdesk-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
