> I really do have to say that I find it so astonishing that major producers of > BibTeX records like JSTOR cannot get these formats right. Rarely does a > record come into the database without my having to tinker with it. Something > is always missing or else wrong. I don't think the basic structure of a BT > record is that complicated.
I fully concur. I almost always have to send feedback to most journals, including Science, Nature, PNAS etc. A shame on the current IT responsible people, who seem to be unable to do even the simplest things right... Regards, Andreas ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Bibdesk-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
