On Sep 1, 2011, at 22:54, Maxwell, Adam R wrote:

> On Sep 1, 2011, at 13:31, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
> 
>> On Sep 1, 2011, at 21:16, Christian Pleul wrote:
>> 
>>> Since an appropriate customization of BibDesk for biblatex (e.g. entry 
>>> types and fields) is already possible, but still very time consuming. Do 
>>> you plan a build in full support for biblatex in an upcoming BibDesk 
>>> versions, e.g. BibDesk 2?
>>> 
>> 
>> No.The big problem with biblatex is that they don't have sensible ideas 
>> about required and optional fields, they really have far, far, far too many 
>> fields. We cannot support that in a sensible way.
> 
> I agree completely.  However, if someone were to create a TypeInfo.plist with 
> all of those fields and make it available for download, it could just be 
> dropped in to ~/Library/Application Support/BibDesk, right?
> 
> -- 
> Adam

That's right. I once asked on this list for someone to link one on the wiki, 
but AFAIK nobody ever did.

Christiaan


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special Offer -- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE!
Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better 
price-free! And you'll get a free "Love Thy Logs" t-shirt when you
download Logger. Secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsisghtdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bibdesk-users mailing list
Bibdesk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users

Reply via email to