On Sunday 11 June 2006 10:45, Sergey Plis wrote: > Hi! > > It looks like there is one more bug. Looking at the session below you > see that during conversion using f>d digits after decimal point are > lost. Is this expected semantics or a bug?
This is expected semantics - d is an integer. > order FLOAT FORTH FORTH ROOT FORTH ok > !2 f>d ok > .s <2> 2 0 ok > d>f f. 2. ok > !0.2 f>d ok > .s <2> 0 0 ok > d>f f. 0. ok > !1.2 f>d ok > .s <2> 1 0 ok > d>f f. 1. ok > > Thank you! -- Bernd Paysan "If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself" http://www.jwdt.com/~paysan/
pgpUsUEfLiuXz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
