Emailed legal-discuss and it sounds like we have to pull the class for now. It'll need to either be replaced entirely or be pulled in as a binary dependency. For 0.1.0, I'm fine with the tests not actually compiling/working, but replacing this will need to be a top priority for the next release.
A. On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Andrew Bayer <[email protected]>wrote: > Will do. > > A. > > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Tom White <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This is probably best raised on legal-discuss >> (http://www.apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html#foundation-legal). >> >> Tom >> >> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Andrew Bayer <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > So one of the iTest files ( >> > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/trunk/test/src/itest-common/src/main/groovy/com/cloudera/itest/junit/OrderedParameterized.java >> ) >> > is a derivate of a JUnit class, and so is dual-licensed with the CPL. >> But >> > the CPL is a Category B license on >> http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html - >> > which suggests that we at the very least don't want to include it, and >> if >> > possible, we should not use it. So does this mean we need to rewrite the >> > class or get rid of it entirely? Anyone have thoughts? >> > >> > A. >> > >> > >
