+1 for review-then-commit I think it provides a good balance of speed and code quality plus there are many initial committers so it should not take too long for a patch to get a review.
-- Andrei Savu / andreisavu.ro On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Andrew Bayer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey all - > > I'm calling a vote on whether we should go with review then commit (R-T-C) > or commit then review (C-T-R). See definitions at > http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html. The vote's open for 72 > hours, and is open to anyone on the committers or mentors list at > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/bigtop.html. Thanks! > > A. >
