Yeah, I would too, but first we need functional build boxes. =) Once we've got those and a functioning build, I'll bang out the patch build.
A. On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Andrew Bayer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > So we've settled on RTC. Now the question is what the process/policy will > > be. I'd tend to go with the most lightweight we can get - a 72 hour > window > > for voting? Does that sound reasonable? Do we need more than one +1 to > > approve something? > > I'd go with 72 hours and just a single +1. I also would like to have a > testpatch-like > process in place so that submitted patches can be automatically vetted > on at least > CentOS/Ubuntu (would be really nice to also include OpenSUSE/Debian). > > Thanks, > Roman. >
