On 08/28/2011 02:29 PM, Bruno Mahé wrote: > On 08/26/2011 12:35 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote: >> ...we should probably do this. I know James had thoughts on what Ubuntu >> releases we should support, and that Bruno's got thoughts on >> Mageia/OpenSUSE, but we should probably codify the list somewhere. Let's >> hear what platforms you all think we should support for 0.2.0, and then >> we'll vote on 'em to build out the list. >> >> A. >> > > Top tier (the one we can't break): > * Latest CentOS (6.0) > * Latest Ubuntu LTS (10.04) > * Latest OpenSUSE (11.4) > * Latest Fedora (15) > > > 2nd tier (the ones without enough interest to be in the top tier, but > enough volunteers to maintain it): > * Latest Mageia (I volunteer to maintain it) > > > The top tier means we can't check in any patch that will break any of > these OSes. It also means we can't upgrade a component of BigTop if that > component cannot be built on any of these OSes. > Regarding the 2nd tier, it means not having a build is not a blocker for > a release and it is fine to have a commit breaking Mageia's support. > Although it does not mean we should break it on purpose either. The more > time I spend fixing Mageia, the less time I spend on other things. > > B.
Hi, What about SLES 11 ? Peter
