On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 10:54AM, Sean Mackrory wrote:
> I neglected to mention that we don't even need to distribute the whole of
> PostgreSQL, and consequently licensing may be even less of an issue.
> Assuming PostgreSQL is distributed through all supported operating systems,
> we just need some code that will install and configure it from those
> repositories.

Could be done through package dependencies, actually. Then all we need is
configuration phase in post-install.

Cos

> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Sean Mackrory <mackror...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > PostgreSQL has a list of rebranded distributions, some of which are
> > redistributed with Hadoop and relicensed under ASL 2.0 (
> > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_derived_databases). Given that
> > the license is a BSD-style license to begin with, this makes me optimistic
> > that licensing will not be an problem. I am not a lawyer.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to