The Saptakoshi embankment collapse at Kusaha, Nepal, on August 18 was not a 
natural disaster, but a man-made tragedy.
   
  The breached embankment of the Saptakoshi - a transboundary river between 
India and Nepal, more commonly called the Kosi - has flooded entire districts, 
damaged infrastructure and left thousands of people homeless in both countries. 
The catastrophe resulted from an unholy marriage of three things: wrong 
technological choice, bad institutional arrangements and half a century of 
political misconduct.
  Wrong choices  The Kosi acts as a massive conveyor belt taking sediment from 
the Himalaya to the Bay of Bengal. Some one hundred million cubic metres of 
gravel, sand and mud flow out of the Chatara gorge in mountainous Nepal every 
year. This flow cannot be blamed on deforestation: we have more forest cover in 
the Kosi catchment today than ever before. It is caused by Himalayan 
geotectonics coupled with the monsoon regime. As the river slows down in the 
flat plains beyond, it deposits its sediment, filling up the river's main 
channel until it overflows and begins a new course. This natural process 
produced the large inland delta that lies across southern Nepal and the Indian 
state of Bihar.
  But, for the last half century, the “Kosi Project” has used embankments to 
restrict the river's course. This has kept sediment deposits within the main 
canal, perching the river some four meters above the surrounding land. It was a 
disaster waiting to happen. Indiscriminate embankment building could never hold 
back the Kosi's sediment. The river flow at the time of last month's breach was 
not even high. Rather, it was lower than the minimum average flow for August.
  And the problem is no longer just the breach site at Kusaha - it is totally 
uncertain where the new Kosi channel will be in the middle and lower delta in 
Bihar. The river morphology dynamics must be examined before considering any 
new embankments or repairs of old ones.
  A high dam on the Kosi is not the answer either. It still ignores the primary 
problem of sedimentation (any reservoir would quickly fill up with Himalayan 
muck). But quite aside from that, it would take two or more decades to build, 
be extremely expensive, create social problems by displacing Nepal's indigenous 
population and does not consider the problems of seismic activity or the need 
to divert instantaneous floods during construction. Neither India nor Nepal can 
afford the technical, economic and social costs associated with a high dam.
  New or alternative technologies, suited to an unstable but very fertile flood 
plain, will have to meet the immediate requirements of Nepal and Bihar. For 
example, traditional solutions like building houses on stilts and giving 
villages raised plinths that keep life and property safe (but that allow 
floodwaters to pass by, leaving fertile silt behind), could be used. Design 
practices in the transport, housing and agriculture sectors will all need 
reconsidering.
  Mismanagement  Institutional mismanagement must also take its share of the 
blame for last month's floods. The Kosi Treaty - signed in 1954 with the aim of 
controlling summer floods and providing irrigation water in winter - was a 
neo-colonial treaty forced upon Nepal. It contains institutional 
irresponsibility at every level.
  For example, it gives the Delhi “hydrocracy” total control, naming India 
responsible for all design, construction, operation and maintenance of the Kosi 
Project. Nepal cannot order the opening of gates during floods or the supply of 
irrigation waters during the dry season.
  Still, in a tragic and perverse way, this catastrophe has washed away the 
very foundations of that treaty, bringing calls for the Kosi's management to be 
reconsidered in a more sane and equitable manner.
  Bad conduct  Any future treaty will also have to deal with another problem - 
corruption. Back in 1991, an Indian scholar writing in Bombay's Economic and 
Political Weekly, estimated that as much as 60 per cent of the 2.5-3 billion 
rupees spent annually by the Bihar government on construction and repair works 
was pocketed by politicians, contractors and engineers. It is said there is a 
perfect system of percentages in which a share exists for everyone who matters, 
from the minister to the junior engineer. The actual expenditure never exceeds 
30 per cent of the budgeted cost. Contractor's bills are paid without being 
verified - many of the desiltation and maintenance works allegedly completed 
are never done at all, and yet payments are made. Indeed, engineers are said to 
make so much money from the percentages that they do not bother to collect 
their salaries.
  My understanding is that Nepali cadres of ruling political parties got wise 
to the corruption practiced from across the border and demanded a share. There 
were, it seems, tough negotiations before the start of this year's monsoon 
season, but no agreement had been reached. Kosi officials made no formal 
approach to the most India-friendly government in power in Nepal because the 
issue to be resolved was not doing the work, but sharing the booty.
  Moving forward  How to move on from here? There are three things that need 
doing. The Kosi floods are a major humanitarian tragedy that Nepal must address 
with an open heart, generous pockets and caring hands. The 50,000 or so Nepalis 
left homeless are, in all probability, permanently displaced since the new Kosi 
seems unlikely to return to its old channel in the foreseeable future. They 
must be immediately housed in camps and helped in finding a permanent 
settlement.
  Reconnecting the regions cut off by the new Kosi in eastern Nepal to the rest 
of the country as soon as possible is also a high priority. This means building 
a bridge over the Kosi at Chatara and restoring the traffic along major 
travelling routes, such as the Mahendra highway.
  And a serious public review and debate must take place to chart a sane path 
forward for the Kosi Project. This must be equitable and fair, involving 
scientists and civic movements in both India and Nepal.
   
  Courtesy: http://web.scidev.net
   
   
   


 Bihar Group 
  E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://yahoogroups.com/group/Bihar-Network
  http://bihar-network.blogspot.com/ 
   
   

       

Reply via email to