after reading the article of mr. anil sadgopalsome of the question arised n my 
mind-
1 do we deserve to rule our nation
2. do we have enuf right thinking people about inda,indianness and reach 
socio-cultural heritage
3 if availalble is it at right place
 


--- On Wed, 29/7/09, Dr.V.N. Sharma <[email protected]> wrote:


From: Dr.V.N. Sharma <[email protected]>
Subject: Bihar.ozg.in - Fwd: A Note on the eve of Right to Education Bill in 
Lok Sabha. [2 Attachments]
To: 
Date: Wednesday, 29 July, 2009, 6:30 PM


  


[Attachment(s) from Dr.V.N. Sharma included below] 


May like to read the story below and in the links and attachments. 


vns


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: anil sadgopal <anilsadgopal@ yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:45 AM
Subject: A Note on the eve of Right to Education Bill in Lok Sabha.
To: arkitect India <arkitectindia@ yahoogroups. com>, IHRO Yahoogroups 
<i...@yahoogroups. com>, Jharkhand googlegroups <jharkh...@googlegro ups.com>, 
Jharkhand Yahoogroups <jharkh...@yahoogrou ps.co.in>, WB-IPT Moderatedlist 
<wb-...@lists. riseup.net>, wbindiacrit list <wbindiacrit@ lists.riseup. net>, 
Highschool Science <highschoolscience@ googlegroups. com>, ICT Education India 
<ict-education- in...@googlegrou ps.com>, shikshaadhikarmanch bhopal 
<shikshaadhikarmanch -bho...@googlegr oups.com>, commonschoolsystem 
righttoeducation googlegroups <commonschoolsystem_ righttoeducation 
@googlegroups. com>
Cc: ramesh patnaik <dramesh...@gmail. com>, G Haragopal <proharagopal@ 
gmail.com>, G Haragopal <profharagopal@ gmail.com>, Vipul Manchala 
<vipulz...@hotmail. com>, Venu APTF <venua...@gmail. com>, Ramakrishnan2 K 
<ramkish...@gmail. com>, Ramakrishnan K <ramkishyamus@ yahoo.com>, All India 
Students' Association <ais...@gmail. com>, Dinesh Abrol <dinesh.abrol@ 
gmail.com>, Sarwat Ali <ali.sar...@gmail. com>, niranjan aradhya 
<aradhyaniranjan@ hotmail.com>, vipin haldwani <vipin...@rediffmail .com>, ravi 
kumar <ravi...@gmail. com>, Madhu Prasad <madhuchopra@ hotmail.com>, mitra 
ranjan <mitraranjan1972@ indiatimes. com>, ashok socialjurist <socialjurist@ 
socialjurist. com>, Banwarilal Sharma <azadi.bachao. ando...@gmail. com>, 
"Dr.BD Sharma" <bharatjanandolan@ gmail.com>, Jitendra sharma <drj...@gmail. 
com>, "Dr.V.N.Sharma" <vns...@gmail. com>, Simantini Dhuru <simantini.dhuru@ 
gmail.com>, Medha Patkar <me...@narmada. org>, Sandeep Pandey <ashaash...@yahoo.
 com>, Sunil SJP <sjpsu...@gmail. com>, drpremsingh@ rediffmail. com







29th July 2009 
  
Dear Friends, 
  
I write to you this personal note on the eve of a [non]-historic so-called 
Right to Education Bill, 2008 Bill being tabled in Lok Sabha. Through this 
Note, I would attempt to share with you my sense of deep anguish and concern 
for the future of our Republic in its sixtieth year. Although, this Note is 
limited to the issue of education as a Fundamental Right, the implications 
encompass all aspects and dimensions of our socio-economic life. 
  
Here is weblink to my article published in The Telegraph on 28th July 2009 (the 
original title of the article read as “The Bill That Denies Right to 
Education”): 
http://www.telegrap hindia.com/ 1090728/jsp/ opinion/story_ 11287996. jsp 
  
Tomorrow (i.e. 29 July 2009) the said Bill will be tabled in Lok Sabha, 
speeches made (“I rise to support the Bill but . . . . “) and passed expectedly 
by a unanimous vote after oral assurances (minus Constitutional guarantees) by 
the Minister of HRD that all will be well. This has been the history of this 
legislative process since 28th November 2001 when the 86th (then 93rd) 
Constitutional Amendment Bill was tabled in Lok Sabha, even as 40,000 people 
from several parts of India were holding a protest rally from Ramlila Grounds 
to Rajghat and back to Ramlila Grounds. Once this is done, we will wait for the 
President to sign the Bill. 
  
The Presidential assent  will mark the full conversion of a Fundamental Right 
into an ordinary statutory right. Who said that? Believe it or not, this was 
stated by the HRD Minister Mr. Kapil Sibal in May 2002 in Rajya Sabha, of 
course then sitting in opposition as member of the Congress Party! Why did he 
say that? As an eminent judicial mind of the country, he knew that the Article 
21A introduced by the 86th Amendment has the conditionality that free and 
compulsory education shall be provided “in such manner as the State may, by 
law, determine.” Such conditionality is not attached to any other Fundamental 
Right.. The State was determined to attach this conditionality in order to use 
it for enacting a law (now being tabled in Lok Sabha on 30th July 2009) whose 
central objective will be to legitimize all the dilution and distortion that 
the school education policy has undergone initially as part of World Bank’s 
DPEP in 1990s and later in SSA during
 the present decade. This was necessary in order to use the Constitution for 
putting a stamp of approval on the neo-liberal programme of privatization and 
commercialization of school education. Sibal’s 100-day agenda almost completes 
a critical phase of the neo-liberal agenda of which this Bill is an integral 
part. 
  
On 20th July 2009, when the present Bill was tabled in Rajya Sabha, several 
members inquired why the children below six years of ago have been kept out of 
their existing Fundamental Right to balanced nutrition, health support and 
pre-primary education. Ironically, the same Mr. Sibal who criticized Article 
21A more than seven years ago in Rajya Sabha had no qualms in stating that “the 
[present] legislation is in the context of [Article] 21A and that is why we 
have not dealt with 0-5 years.” 
  
This is why I have been consistently maintaining since November 2001 that 86th 
Constitutional Amendment is a neo-liberal intervention in our Constitution and 
the consequential Right to Education Bill under Article 21A in Lok Sabha has to 
be viewed as a neo-liberal Bill. I wait for history to vindicate my stand. 
  
On 23rd July 2009, the All India Forum for Right to Education (AIF-RTE) 
organized a delegation to meet the Lok Sabha Speaker Ms. Meira Kumar (see 
attachment for the Memorandum with a detailed critique of the Bill). The 
delegation was led by Com. D. Raja, Natl. Secy of CPI and a Rajya Sabha member. 
Ms. Medha Patkar and Sh. Sandeep Pande joined the delegation and endorsed the 
AIF-RTE stand. We appealed to Ms. Meira Kumar to return the Bill to the 
Ministry’s Parliamentary Standing Committee (or a joint select committee) with 
directions to hold Public Hearings on the Bill around the country in a 
democratic and transparent manner. Why this demand at this late stage? To be 
sure, this demand is 4 years and 8 months old. Public Hearings on the Bill (as 
well as during its drafting process) have been demanded since CABE’s Kapil 
Sibal Committee began the process of drafting the present Bill in November 
2004. However, not one Public Hearing has been held either
 by CABE or by the HRD Ministry – not even by the PM’s Office which sat over 
the various drafts – each one more diluted that the previous one – for almost 
39 months from August 2005 onwards. Public Hearings were denied even by the 
Ministry’s Parliamentary Standing Committee which preferred to discuss the Bill 
with Ministry’s bureaucrats and official ‘educrats’ in closed chambers rather 
than with representatives of various education rights organizations or people’s 
movements, refusing to even accept submissions and Memoranda. Hence this demand 
to the Lok Sabha speaker. 
  
You may like to ask what happens to children’s Fundamental Right while the 
Public Hearings are held and the Bill amended or re-drafted on the basis of the 
public feedback. Would this not further delay the provision of the Fundamental 
Right which is about to be given after waiting for it for sixty years? NO, NOT 
ALL! This is so because the Fundamental Right to Education, without any 
conditionality whatsoever, is inherent in the Constitution, as declared by 
Supreme Court’s Unnikrishnan Judgment (1993). Various High Courts have been 
giving their judgments on education as a Fundamental Right under Unnikrishnan 
Judgment for the past several years. This Bill is designed only to dilute and 
distort the existing Fundamental Right. 
  
On 28th July, Shiksha Adhikar Manch, Bhopal organized a day-long peaceful 
dharna (with some members fasting) in front of Babasaheb Ambedkar’s statue in 
Bhopal and underlined three major violations of the Constitution by the Bill 
being tabled before Lok Sabha. In addition, the Manch urged upon the Lok Sabha 
members to “rise above their narrow party considerations, listen to the voice 
of their inner conscience and stand up against this anti-Constitutional , 
anti-education and anti-child Bill that denies Fundamental Right to almost 45 
crore children up to 18 years of age.” This is critical for protecting the 
Constitution and saving our education system from further deterioration and 
neo-liberal assaults which this Bill is going to institutionalize (see 
attachment for Manch’ Press Release in Hindi). 
  
On the eve of this farcical and neo-liberal Bill being tabled in Lok Sabha, 
AIF-RTE invites all fellow citizens and like-minded people’s organizations to 
join us in building a powerful long-term movement to challenge Sibal’s agenda 
to sell our education system to corporate houses and the global capital and, in 
the process also build people’s consciousness about the Constitution’s vision 
of Right to Education. Before closing, let me add that while what is focused 
upon in this Note constitutes reflections on the neo-liberal assault on 
Fundamental Right to Education, such an assault is taking place simultaneously 
on all sectors of the nation’s life. Drawing lessons from our sectoral 
concerns, we must learn to build a common political agenda to effectively 
resist this wide-ranging and multi-dimensional attack endangering the future of 
India as a sovereign nation and its survival as a democratic, egalitarian and 
secular society. 
  
ZINDABAAD! 
  
Sincerely, 
  
Anil Sadgopal 
  
Attachments  

AIF-RTE Memorandum dated 23.07.2009 to Lok Sabha Speaker.
Shiksha Adhikar Manch’ Press Release dated 28.07.2009 regarding the dilution of 
the Constitution by the Bill and our call to the Lok sabha members. 



































Yahoo! recommends that you upgrade to the new and safer Internet Explorer 8.


-- 
Dr.V.N.Sharma
http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ User:Dr.V. N.Sharma

"Those who have the privilege to know, have the duty to act." Albert Einstein


"The only thing necessary for Evil to Flourish is for good men to do nothing" 
Edmund Burke




















      Love Cricket? Check out live scores, photos, video highlights and more. 
Click here http://cricket.yahoo.com

Reply via email to