> From: Sheldon Isaac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Saw this in phl.transportation:
> --------
> Subject: Re: Classic urban traffic dilemma
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hal)
> Newsgroups: phl.transportation
...
> > Actually, you are only required to use the lane or path if it is
> > indicated as mandatory "by official traffic control devices", whatever
> > that means. See "Section 3505 (f)" of the above link.  As far as I
> > know, no lanes or paths are mandatory in Philadelphia.
> 
> But, that's Pennsylvania Law, Philly Ordinance says you must use an
> off road route if there is one , but you must not use the sidewalk. 
> They seem to set up the logical paradox that a side walk IS an off
> road route.   So if it's a bike route, you have to use it.

Anybody know if this is ture? The Philadelphia Ordinaces are not online and I 
can't find a reference. My understanding had been that lanes are definitely NOT 
mandatory and that paths were mandatory only if the city put up signs saying 
they were.

-Peter Rosenfeld

----
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named
"bike."  To subscribe or unsubscribe or for archive information, see
<http://www.purple.com/list.html>.

Reply via email to