At 10:12 AM -0700 10/3/02, Steve Tudisco wrote: >FYI, > >There is a short article in today�s mullet wrapper >(Wisconsin State Journal) about the �North Beltline�. >I could not find a link to the article on the WSJ web >page. The options are slow, medium, and fast. It >all depends on how fast you want the traffic to go. >No comments on mass transit or biking in the article.
Also, no comments on what purpose any of these roads would serve. Do we need a quiet 2-lane road to serve local traffic? Do we need a freeway to serve the high demand for travel between I90 and Hwy 12? In previous meetings I attended, the options included 'improving' (expanding) existing roads, but not building any new roads. Is that off the table now? Here's a quote from the article: consultant Mike Slavney: " if you do a freeway first, you're going to be sucking development into that area ahead of its time." This should be obvious to anyone. _______________________________________________ Bikies mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies
