Mitchell Nussbaum: > One possible explanation: there are no interchanges on Hwy 14 > between McCoy Road and the outskirts of Oregon, so the freeway > doesn't do much to make this land more accessible to > development. > > Also, there's land use policy to consider: the land to the > east of the freeway is in the Town of Dunn, which regulates > development very strictly. (The road itself goes through > Fitchburg.)
Does the US14 example have implications for the north beltline? Specifically I wonder when a limited access freeway might be a better anti-sprawl choice than the remaining alternatives (if ever). Mitch points out two conditions under which this might be the case. A. Land use controls in place B. Limited number of interchanges Should we require adopted land use plans before any new highway construction? When should we advocate in favor of limited access highways? Joe -- Joseph King [EMAIL PROTECTED] bombay: www.BombayBicycle.org madnorski: www.MadNorSki.org -- _______________________________________________ Bikies mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies
