[This is really Paul this time, by the way.] Indeed Joe is right. If you go back thru the thread, there's nothing implying he's wrong. Indeed, as Joe so illustratively demonstrated, it's easy to commit forgery on the Internet. Nothing I posted implied otherwise. Yes, even Kathryn's post about the reply letter from the station might be a forgery; either she might have received it as a forgery or someone might have sent it forging her Email addy. I haven't seen anything posted from Kathryn since then implying either one. So I stand by the apparent case that the station has NEVER said that they can prove the DJs in question didn't say what they're accused of having said. An admittedly semi-cursory search of both the WMJI web site and that of the two DJs turned up nothing of the kind either.
Does that mean that the accusations are true? Not necessarily, Of course. Have any posts to bikies by anyone implied that? None that I could find. What does it mean? Exactly what it has implied all along: come to your own conclusions, using the evidence put before you and your own judgment wrt its veracity. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Actually from Joe King) > When Joe said he would not base a possibly criminal judgment on something posted > on the Internet, he was right. As this message demonstrates it is too easy to > put words into any moulth you like using email. > > THIS MESSAGE WAS ACTUALLY SENT BY Joe King as a demostration and a reminder to > all.--------------------- Paul T. O'Leary Desktop Insurgent Madison WI USA _______________________________________________ Bikies mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies
