On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 17:29:44, Now go have a beer Bob Paolino said:

"A "pay-not-to-drive" plan aimed at slowing down global warming
needs to recognise that miles (or kilometres) don't cause global warming,
burning dinofuel does, so the credit should reward people who cause less
pollution, and if they can do it with more efficient and cleaner vehicles
all the better."

A motor vehicle that averages 20 miles to the gallon, and is driven
10,000 miles in a year, emits 5.5 tons of CO2 to the atmosphere a year.
A motor vehicle that averages 40 miles to the gallon, and is driven
10,000 miles in a year, emits 2.75 tons of CO2 to the atmosphere a year.

A motor vehicle that averages 20 miles to the gallon, and is driven 5,000
miles in a year, emits 2.25 tons of CO2 to the atmosphere a year.
A motor vehicle that averages 40 miles to the gallon, and is driven 5,000
miles in a year, emits 1.125 tons of CO2 to the atmosphere a year.

People driving fewer vehicle miles (in a day, month, year) reduces the
cumulative impacts on the environment no matter the kind of vehicle
driven.  Those who buy the gas guzzlers (and drive them) impact the
environment, and therefore humans and animals), even more than those who
buy and drive more efficient motor vehicles; but they pay higher amounts
of fuel taxes as a result.  No argument fuel taxes should be higher.  The
extra funds left over from the higher fuel taxes should be used in
providing additional incentive (rebates) for people to drive less (a
double incentive:  the increase in fuel tax is a negative incentive; the
annual rebates for driving less is a positive one). 

Driving less helps the community and environment in other ways as well. 
For example, if less overall miles are driven in the
state/county/community, there is less of need to expand highways into
other areas not presently dedicated to highway use.  Reduced widening of
highways (or creating highway by passes of communities), thus reduces the
costs involved in highway expansion, less disruption of agricultural
land, wildlife habitat or residential/commercial relocations.  Because
the new or wider highway is no longer needed, the economic and
environmental costs of excavating the hillsides (for gravel used in
concrete, sand and gravel in grading the highways, etc.) are eliminated. 


With reduced miles driven in a city/county/state there is less potential
for safety problems associated with heavy automobile use of streets that
might be used by bicyclists, or crossed by pedestrians and bicyclists
using bike paths intersecting with city streets.

You might be interested in knowing that in 1970, the number of motor
vehicle miles traveled (VMT) on Wisconsin roadways was 22 billion;  by
the end of 1998, VMT more than doubled to 50.4 billion miles/per,
increasing 7 times Wisconsin's population growth percentage during those
years of 15% from 1970-98.

Motor vehicle miles traveled in Wisconsin climbed from 50.4 billion miles
per year in 1998 to 58.7 billion miles by the end of 2002, an increase
of[   ] in just fours years (increasing an average of [   ] billion
additional VMT each year since 1998.

Motor vehicle miles traveled in Dane County increased from 3 billion
miles in year 1990 to 4.6 billion miles in year 2000, a 53% increase in
10 years, or more than 3 times Dane County's population growth of 16%
during that same period.  VMT in Dane County increased from 4.6 for year
2001 to 4.8 billion miles for year 2002, increasing by .

In 2000, a family of 4 in Dane County drove an average of 43,200 miles,
or 32% more miles (10,500 miles), than did a family of 4 living in Dane
County in 1990.

http://madison.indymedia.org/newswire/display_any/4580 
Global Warming is Irreversible - Time to Slow it is NOW!
by Michael T. Neuman 
May 6, 2002 






________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies

Reply via email to