I think the message is slowly sinking in. By the way, Mike, why all the fuss over route 10? is it popular? -darin
>From another CapTimes article: http://www.madison.com/archives/ read.php?ref=tct:2003:09:23:281943:FRONT .... Action on proposed route changes was delayed because there was some concern that changes earmarked for Route 10 on the city's east side were not properly noticed, commission member Robbie Webber said this morning. "We're looking at possible changes in other routes that would essentially keep what people love about the 10," she said. The panel will hold another public hearing on that route and possible options at its next meeting on Oct. 20 in Room 300 of the Madison Municipal Building, 210 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. The hearing will begin at 5 p.m. > > From: "Michael D. Barrett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2003/09/20 Sat PM 05:37:04 CDT > > This quote, from the Cap Times article below, is a gross (to be > diplomatique) misstatement: > > >Persich said the transit utility's intentions regarding the route > >were publicized for the spring public hearing. > > > >"Route 10 was identified in the public notice last May as being > >replaced by Route 9, but I don't think people picked up on it," > > It was not then, and has not now been properly noticed. > -Mike Barrett _______________________________________________ Bikies mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies
