Scooters should scoot.  Take motorcycles with them.

--------- Forwarded message ----------
http://www.gristmagazine.com/ask/ask052803.asp?source=daily 

The Wheel Deal 

Sage advice on minivans, motorcycles, and more by Umbra Fisk 

28 May 2003

Dear Umbra,

I recently read a claim that "motorcycles produce far more pollution per
mile than your typical car, truck, or SUV." Is that true? I've got a
friend who's currently making her (bad-ass) way across country on a
Harley -- 60 mpg, baby -- and we are both curious about the environmental
impacts compared with a car.

Billy
Brooklyn, N.Y.

Dearest Billy,

Bad news for your friend and her bad behind. If she's getting 60 miles
per gallon, that's about three times better than the average car these
days, and certainly far better than the 1984 Nissan Rustbucket that I
drove across country when I made my pilgrimage to Gristonia years ago.
(Appalling, I know, but I was young, and the car was free.) 

However, and this is the word from California -- where they actually care
about car exhaust, post signs in garages warning that carcinogens are
present, and have an entire government department devoted to breathing --
anyway, the word from California is that the cleanest 2004 motorcycle is
eight to nine times dirtier than the dirtiest 2004 car. Put differently,
the best allowable California motorcycle is many times worse than the
worst allowable California car. This "worst" is in terms of pollutants,
not greenhouse gases. The U.S. EPA says the motorcycle hydrocarbon burden
is 90 times higher than that of the typical passenger car, and a
motorcycle releases 20 times more total pollution per mile than a new
car.

Why is such a high-mileage engine so dirty? Well, I'm glad you asked,
because it means: Time to talk about the internal combustion engine! Our
car engines are powered by endlessly repeating small explosions. Gas is
forced into a small space and then ignited, resulting in a powerful
explosion: Think aerosol cans in a campfire. The energy from the
explosion is used to move other parts of the engine, such as pistons,
cranks, rods, reels, hooks, etc. Excitingly comprehensible diagrams of
this process can be found at HowStuffWorks.com. If an engine were
perfectly efficient, the only combustion byproducts would be carbon
dioxide and water. Instead, we get other byproducts, such as carbon
monoxide, hydrocarbons, particulate matter, and nitrous oxides, which are
poisonous/smog-forming/depressing. That's what's following after your
pal's bad behind.

Car engines have become cleaner over time through innovations (such as
fuel injection) that allow fuel to burn more efficiently. Catalytic
converters also clean up car exhaust by converting harmful compounds as
they pass through a catalyst. (Go figure.) Motorcycle manufacturers have
been slow to add efficiency and catalytic converters to their engines but
are working with regulators to clean up their acts. Trouble is, anything
that adds weight to the engine can impede its bad-ass performance.
Motorcycle regulations are steadily improving, and the feds are following
California's guidelines. Still, to date, motorcycles are bad, bad, bad.

Cautiously,
Umbra

Dear Umbra,

I was thinking of buying a scooter with the idea that (in addition to
being fun) I would be using a more fuel-efficient means of transportation
on days when the weather was good. Then I got the edition of the Daily
Grist telling me how dirty motorcycles are. Now I'm worried: Are scooters
the same? I'm talking about a Vespa-type thing. Please tell me that's not
as polluting as a Harley!

Thanks (even if the answer isn't what I want to hear!),
Patricia
Audubon, Penn.

Dearest Patricia,

The answer is not what you want to hear. To continue our exploration of
the coarser points of engine mechanics and travel safety, which I'm sure
is making the experts out there cringe, we will now discuss the
two-stroke vs. four-stroke engine. The best way to understand this
distinction is to look at the two-stroke diagram and four-stroke diagram
on HowStuffWorks.com, so go there right now if you wish to skip my crude
explanations, or at least understand them. In a four-stroke engine, the
explosion that powers your car has four steps, called strokes because of
the piston movements: The gas is injected, the gas is compressed, the gas
is ignited, and the explosion leaves the chamber. In general, four-stroke
engines are found in larger mobile transit sources, like Nissan
Rustbuckets, and, increasingly, in motorcycles.

Two-stroke engines combust in, surprise, two steps: The fuel and oil are
mixed and compressed in a separate chamber, then brought into the piston
area, where ignition and exhaust happen in two strokes. Compared with
four-stroke engines, two-stroke engines are powerful for their size,
lighter, shorter lived, and filthy dirty. They are found in scooters,
chain saws, lawn mowers, jet skis, and so forth. There is a moment in the
two-strokers' combustion process when the intake and exhaust valves are
open simultaneously, allowing some gas/oil mixture to escape into the
outside world in the form of liquid (the oil sheen around motorboats),
gases (the poisonous/smog-forming/depressing compounds mentioned in the
motorcycle question), and asthma-causing particulate matter. As much as
30 percent of the fuel may escape, depending on the engine.

Cheap, powerful, fun scooters and their exhaust are a huge health concern
in crowded Asian cities, where they are often the most significant mobile
source of pollution. So far, scooters are not as big a concern in U.S.
cities, where we are wed to larger vehicles and our sprawling cities are
built with cars in mind. But just think about the snowmobiles in
Yellowstone and you'll know what kinds of problems two-stroke engines
pose in rural areas. Here are the sobering comparisons you're looking
for: Scooters are more polluting than Harleys. They have equivalent
particulate-matter emissions to large diesel trucks, and three times the
carbon monoxide and hydrocarbon emissions of those trucks. On the bright
side, their low fuel use means they contribute fewer global-warming gases
such as carbon dioxide and nitrogen oxides (NOx). 

In short, from an environmental standpoint, four-stroke motorcycles with
catalytic converters are a far better two-wheeled choice than scooters.
The engine is more efficient, fuel economy is comparable or better
(meaning less greenhouse gas emissions), the engine will last longer
(reducing the manufacturing burden), and exhaust pollutants are lower. 

If you're totally wedded to owning a scooter, there are electric models
that you could look into. Otherwise, I have one word for you: bicycle.

Vroom,
Umbra

Hi Umbra,

I'm wondering if you have any numbers comparing the fuel efficiency of
flying versus driving the average car for the same distance. Also, how
does carbon dioxide production compare for the same trip?

Steve
Loomis, Calif.

Dearest Steve,

Here's what I can find so far, courtesy of the Rocky Mountain Institute
in beautiful Snowmass, Colo. Single-occupancy automobiles produce 0.91
pounds of carbon dioxide per mile. (You can do the long division to
figure out the per-person impact if more people are traveling.)
Commercial aircrafts, meanwhile, produce 0.57 pounds of CO2 per person
per mile. However, planes emit gobs of other pollutants at high
altitudes, particularly our smoggy friends the nitrogen oxides, which may
almost triple the climate impact of plane travel. Little is known about
the effects of atmospheric releases of NOx. 

As you know, the pollution impact of every plane trip includes your
travel to and from the airport, all the little golf carts zipping around
on the tarmac, and the thousands of airline employees who go to work to
get you on the plane. These other "mobile sources" must be factored into
the per-mile pollution burden of air travel, and RMI appears to be
working on it.

Flightily,
Umbra






________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies

Reply via email to