Dane County and the State of Wisconsin officials are among the many
governmental officials not taking global warming seriously enough.  If
they did, they would not even be considering projects like the expansion
of the West Beltline in Madison, a four lane highway around the east side
of Madison and a Verona Road Freeway.   
------------------------------------------
Most government officials today now say they take the problem of climate
change seriously. Yet their action reflect neither the enormity of the
threat nor the scale -- much less the urgency -- of what is required
to minimize that threat.  Articles from recent news publications follow. 
As scientists are sounding the alarms on the status of global warming,
Government in the U.S., at all levels, continues to snooze.

Mike Neuman
http://www.madison.com/communities/preserveourclimate
-----------------------

All the top U.S. scientists are saying the same thing now. Immediate
action must be taken now to offset impact of global warming.  From a news
release, June 24, 2004: "Climate Experts Urge Immediate Action to Offset
Imp act of Global Warming", by the American Association for the
Advancement of Science [AAAS]:
.
Governments and consumers in the United States and worldwide should take
immediate steps to reduce the threat of global warming and to prepare for
a
future in which coastal flooding, reduced crop yields and elevated rates
of
climate-related illness are all but certain, top U.S. scientists said
Tuesday.

At a meeting organized by AAAS and its journal, Science, the climate
researchers argued that while some policy experts and sectors of the
public dispute the risk, there is in fact no cause for doubt: The world
is
significantly warmer today than it was a century ago--and it's getting
warmer.
Without action now, they warned, the impact could be
devastating.

As the Earth warms, ice sheets are melting and sea levels are
rising--island and
river-delta communities already are vanishing beneath the waves. Native
Inuit
fishermen are falling through thinning Arctic ice they've traversed many
times
before. In recent decades, climate change claimed some 150,000 lives in
2000 and
sickened many others, especially elderly people and very young children,
according to the World Health Organization.

One of the conference experts, Harvard geochemistry Professor Daniel
Schrag,
likened the situation to the Titanic after it hit the iceberg. "So if
you're
standing at the back of the Titanic, you're thinking, 'Oh,
I'm going up, we can't be sinking'."

"We are performing an experiment at a planetary scale that hasn't been
done for
millions of years," Schrag said. "This should not be a partisan issue,"
he
added. "We cannot wait for a catastrophe to appear before we act because
by then
it would be too late. The next few decades will determine our path for
the next
century."

http://www.aaas.org/news/releases/2004/0616climate.shtml
Presentations by scientists in pdf (AAAS website):
http://www.aaas.org/news/releases/2004/0603climate2.shtml
----------------------

June 27, 2004
Forecast for New York This Century: Hotter and Wetter

By ANTHONY DePALMA
 
It will not happen the day after tomorrow. Nor a decade from now. 

But well before this century ends, global warming will make New York
City and the metropolitan area that surrounds it a hotter, wetter and
significantly less healthy place to live and work, according to a
federally financed study released on Friday by a group of scientists
at Columbia University. 

The three-year study by the New York Climate and Health Project is the
most detailed look ever at the effects of global warming on New York.
It makes no doomsday predictions, but it paints a worrisome portrait
of New York's vulnerability to global climate change. 

As global temperatures rise by 2.4 to 10.4 degrees Fahrenheit by 2100,
a densely developed area like New York City will be hit even harder,
the scientists said, because it has so few trees and so much
heat-retaining concrete and asphalt. 

Higher temperatures intensify the creation of ozone, worsening air
pollution and making the city unhealthier for the elderly and other
vulnerable groups, including children in poor neighborhoods that now
have some of the highest rates of asthma in the country.

According to the study, heat-related deaths, which averaged about 840
a year in the region through the 1990's, could more than double by the
2050's and increase by 258 percent by the 2080's if higher
temperatures are accompanied by unchecked development. The study
showed that four of New York's five boroughs - Staten Island was not
included - would endure the sharpest increase in deaths related to the
heat, while in the less developed parts of the 31-county metropolitan
region the rise would be less severe. 

For the three-year study project, scientists, doctors and
environmental specialists from Columbia and other universities joined
in an unusual collaboration, sharing information and insights to
assess global warming's effects on public health. 

While previous studies looked at areas no smaller than the entire
northeastern United States, this one covered areas as small as 2.5
square miles. As work on the project continues, projections could
eventually be made for single neighborhoods; this would create
important policy implications. 

"Climate change is not going to impact all communities equally," said
Cecil Corbin-Mark, program director of West Harlem Environmental
Action. He said the study should help city officials realize that
crucial decisions on land use and policy, even some as simple as
deciding how many air-conditioned "cooling centers" the city needs on
heat emergency days, "cannot wait to be made." 

The coming environmental changes will be caused not just by global
warming but also by increased urbanization. 

"If we're not careful, we'll have our own global warming situation
right here, just because of the way we're building things," said Dr.
Barry H. Lynn, a meteorologist at Columbia University and the
NASA-Goddard Institute for Space Studies who worked on the study.
Temperatures in the city will be driven up 2 to 3 percent over the
next 50 years by continued development in New York, he said, unless
developments are designed in a way that reduces their environmental
effects. 

Measures like rooftop gardens and rain collection systems are already
being included in the designs for some new buildings in New York. Dr.
Lynn said that such initiatives help, but that officials will have to
change building codes and offer more incentives if they are to have a
real impact on the city's climate and public health. 

Besides the direct effect of the higher temperatures, the study
outlines many secondary or related results of climate change. For
instance, devastating floods that now are expected to occur once a
century could hit the area every 40 years. Melting ice would raise the
oceans and rivers, driving insects and vermin, along with the diseases
they carry, from the water's edge into the city. Molds, allergens and
water-borne illnesses would spread rapidly. 
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/27/nyregion/27study.html?ei=5062&en=fd70c9
dbc37eeedb&ex=1088913600&partner=GOOGLE&pagewanted=print&position=
-------------

Date:  Mon Jun 21, 2004  4:14 pm
Subject:  Large investors considering ecological risks: Study
Large investors are starting to put heat on companies that fail to take
account of their impact on the environment, a investors' study released
recently indicates.

"The financial risk of climate change and greenhouse gas emissions has
swiftly become a matter of primary concern among members of the global
investment community," the Carbon Disclosure Project stated.

Investors "are increasingly demanding an accounting of such risk exposure
from companies in which they hold shares," it said. "In turn, more global
companies are acknowledging their responsibility."

The international project, representing 95 institutional investors with
assets totalling $10 trillion (U.S.), noted in releasing its second
survey that the growth in its membership points to the seriousness of the
issue. Last year's report was completed on behalf of 35 institutions
managing $4 trillion (U.S.).

"The investment community is showing a profound new awareness of its
fiduciary responsibility relating to climate change, and sending an
unmistakable message to corporations that their investors will no longer
tolerate a lack of accountability about their exposures and practices,"
stated James Cameron, chairman of the London-based project.

The report includes a list of the 50 companies whose responses best
addressed climate-change issues. Two Canadian corporations made that
list: the Royal Bank and Suncor Energy.

It also cites companies that are "behind the curve," including Microsoft,
which was said to have failed to acknowledge the need for computer
operating systems to reduce electricity consumption.

A dozen other major companies did not bother to reply at all to the
survey, including Honeywell, Boeing, Morgan Stanley and Sears, Roebuck.

"Companies ignoring their investors will invite - and warrant -particular
scrutiny," Cameron warned.

"More than ever, investors of all sizes are making their wishes known on
this key issue and are willing to reallocate their assets if necessary."

The project's members include the Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan, Acuity
Investments and CI Mutual Funds from Canada, and international investment
banks Credit Suisse, Merrill Lynch, UBS and State Street Global Advisors.

The report was released on the same day that the chairman of the British
wing of the Royal Dutch/Shell global oil group was quoted as saying he
sees "very little hope for the world" unless carbon dioxide emissions are
reduced.

Lord Oxburgh, a geologist by training, told Britain's Guardian newspaper
that "no one can be comfortable at the prospect of continuing to pump out
the amounts of carbon dioxide that we are at present."

Canadian Press
http://www.electricityforum.com/news/jun04/investeco.html
---------
Wednesday, June 16 2004

Alarm Sounded on Global Warming
By Juliet Eilperin

Ten of the nation's top climate researchers warned yesterday that
policymakers must act soon to address the dangers associated with
global warming, which they described as a looming threat that will
hit hardest and soonest at the world's poor and at farmers.

"By mid-century, millions more poor children around the world are
likely to face displacement, malnourishment, disease and even
starvation unless all countries take action now to slow global warming"
and sea-level rises that will follow, Michael Oppenheimer, who teaches
geosciences and international affairs at Princeton University, said
at a conference. "Imagine the difficulties faced by families in
Bangladesh. An area where about 8 million people now live would be
underwater if global sea level were to rise half a meter. Where are they
going to go?"

The day-long conference, organized by Donald Kennedy, editor of
Science magazine, and Albert Teich, director of science and policy
for the American Association for the Advancement of Science, was
aimed at convincing the public and politicians that there is ample
evidence that the buildup of carbon dioxide is transforming ecosystems
worldwide.

Bush administration officials have consistently sparred with
environmentalists on how hard it should crack down on carbon dioxide
emissions and other heat-trapping industrial and tailpipe gases. In
2001, Bush opted out of the Kyoto agreement on global warming, which
would have forced the United States to impose stricter limits on
greenhouse gases, on grounds that it would cost American jobs and
exempt developing countries from the new standards.

Kennedy called climate change "the most serious issue" we face and
said the scientific community must "make a clear expression" on the
subject.

The academics emphasized that if international leaders do not act
soon, they will not have the option of reversing global warming.
David S. Battisti, who teaches at the University of Washington, said it
is "a huge risk" not to curb greenhouse gases.

"You have to start doing things now," he said. "To undo it or stop it is
not possible."

Researchers, including Chris Field of the Carnegie Institution, said
scientists have begun to detect evidence that various species are
having to adjust to global warming. Hundreds of species have moved to
cooler regions, Field said, and agricultural yields are declining.

"We're seeing the least-competitive species in the ecosystem being
winnowed out," he said. "If pushed hard enough, this sensitivity is
going to blossom into profound problems."

Bob Hopkins, spokesman for the White House Office of Science and
Technology Policy, said the administration has taken steps, including
devoting $4 billion to climate change science and technology
programs. The Commerce Department is also speeding up deployment
of technology to measure atmospheric aerosols and carbon.

"The administration takes this issue very seriously and the president
has laid out an aggressive plan to address climate change," he said.

http://www.washingtonpost.com

------------------------
Experts Link Asthma to Global Warming
Mon 21 Jun 2004

By John Innes

Global warming could lead to more people in Britain suffering the misery
of asthma, new research suggests today. A major study of almost 670,000
children has found a clear link between indoor humidity and asthma rates
in western Europe.

Every 10 per cent increase in indoor humidity was associated with a 2.7
per cent increase in the prevalence of asthma symptoms, the researchers
found.

House dust mites, which trigger asthma attacks, thrive in moist air, and
humidity encourages mould which can irritate the airways.

The study also found that places where average outdoor humidity dropped
below 50 per cent for at least one month a year had lower rates of
asthma. Warmer temperatures caused by climate change are expected to
drive up humidity levels, especially in cities.

Experts believe summers in the city will get stickier because of the
"urban heat island" effect caused by asphalt and concrete trapping heat
at night.

The impact of climate change was acknowledged by the authors of the
asthma study, led by Dr Stephen Weiland from the University of Ulm in
Germany.

Writing in the journal Occupational and Environmental Medicine, they said
the evidence showed that climate can affect rates of asthma and eczema in
children. The researchers added: "This may also have implications for the
assessment of potential health effects due to climate change."

The scientists found that temperature, altitude, humidity and latitude
all influenced the prevalence of asthma and eczema. Information was
collected between 1992 and 1996 from children aged six to seven, and 12
to 13, from more than 50 countries.

The research formed part of a major worldwide investigation, called the
International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC).

When the data was analysed, it showed the strong link between indoor
humidity and asthma rates for both age groups. The trend emerged in
western Europe, where the study focused on 57 centres in 12 countries.

Increasing latitude was associated with higher rates of eczema, and
higher outdoor temperatures with lower rates.

An association has been seen before between thunderstorms and higher
numbers of hospital admissions due to asthma, but little is known about
the effect of long-term climatic conditions on the disease.

Londoners can expect many more sweaty nights in years to come, as a
result of rising levels of greenhouse gas in the atmosphere, New
Scientist magazine reported last week. In the past 30 years, there have
been only 20 nights when the minimum temperature in London failed to fall
below 20C. Doubling carbon-dioxide levels could quadruple that figure,
but adding the urban heat island effect could see it soar by a factor of
six - an extra three nights a year at least.

Richard Betts, from the Met Office�s Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction
in Exeter, said: "This could have quite significant effects on human
health."

Last year�s heatwave in Europe is estimated to have caused at least
20,000 deaths.

Source: news.scotsman.com
-------------

Namibia seen as vulnerable to long-term climate change
Tuesday, June 8, 2004 - Web posted at 9:32:18 GMT

LINDSAY DENTLINGER

Climate change aside, Namibia is expected to face an absolute water
scarcity by 2020.

Ranked among countries that are likely to be the most vulnerable to
climate change in the coming years, the water sector will be the hardest
hit.

The greatest impact is likely to be in the central areas.

"Even in the case of a moderate increase in evaporation of 15 per cent
and no change in rainfall, the additional stress on the water sector due
to climate change would be severe," says Namibia's report to the United
Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change launched by the Ministry
of Environment and Tourism yesterday.

Investigations have shown that the sea level is expected to rise by as
much as a metre by 2100, and will inundate significant parts of Walvis
Bay.

Swakopmund and Henties Bay will also suffer from the changes, but to a
lesser degree.

Minimum and maximum temperatures are likely to between two and six
degrees Celsius higher in the next 96 years.

While there is still considerable uncertainty about what will happen to
rainfall patterns, the report says that even if rainfall decreased by 30
per cent and coincided with an increase in evaporation of the same
amount, as projected by some, "the impact on the water sector and human
development in Namibia would be extreme".

Predictions of a change in rainfall patterns range from a minimal
increase of 30 mm a year to severe decreases of 200 mm below the current
annual average.

Climate change refers to any change in the earth's climate system that
departs significantly from average weather conditions that occurred in
the past few hundred years.

The changes may be due to natural variation; human activities, such as
the burning of fossil fuels; and the conversion of natural areas to farms
and urban areas.

As a signatory to the convention since 1995, Namibia is required to
document its situation regarding greenhouse gas emissions and the
anticipated impact of climate change.

The aim of the convention is to stabilise greenhouse gas concentrations
in the atmosphere at a level that will minimise interference with the
climate system.

The report, that also outlines Namibia's mitigating actions and what it
needs to respond to the effects of climate change, paints a bleak future
for the productivity of the country's agricultural and marine fisheries
as a result.

In the long run, climate change could also have a dramatic effect on
household food security.

"In the extreme, climate change could lead to social disruptions and
displacement amongst rural communities," notes the report.

Fisheries could be affected by possible changes to the Benguela Current.

This warming trend may have already contributed to the decline in fish
stocks in recent years and could have a significant economic impact on
Namibia in future.

The health of Namibians will also not escape the effects of climate
change and an increase in malaria, under-nutrition, diarrhoea and acute
respiratory infections are forecast.

"Projected changes in climate could extend the area at risk from malaria
southwards into the centre of the country, a trend that is already
apparent," says the report.

While Namibia contributes very little to the world's greenhouse gas
emissions, not enough is known about the extent and rate of bush
encroachment and the consequent magnitude of carbon dioxide uptake.

The transport sector produces about half of Namibia's total carbon
dioxide emissions and the current figure is expected to triple by 2100.

The digestive systems of cattle and sheep contribute 98 per cent of the
methane emissions - a primary greenhouse gas.

Emissions of nitrous oxide are small and come mainly from savannah grass
fires.
http://www.namibian.com.na/2004/June/national/04476639D0.html
----

THE WORLD IS IN CRISIS DUE TO GLOBAL WARMING!

Hydrologist's recommended links:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ClimateArchive/message/608

Financial incentives-ConserveNow!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ClimateArchive/message/229
 


________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the Web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies

Reply via email to