At 07:14 AM 10/20/2006, Robert F. Nagel wrote:
but it seems like the realistic solution is to make that block a mult-use path, since bikes just go one way on it, it seems that bikes could survive with half the width, or just have a stripe down the center and a passing lane on the left, and a sign saying pedestrians keep right.
even if that path were wide enough to accommodate that suggestion (and I'm fairly certain that it is not), it still shows that the "solution" always seems to be reducing capacity (sometimes to nil) for bikes and/or pedestrians.
why, exactly, is it not reasonable to consider reducing the capacity for cars by 33%, rather than reducing the capacity for bikes and/or peds by anywhere from half of previous conditions to nothing at all?
chuck _______________________________________________ Bikies mailing list [email protected] http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies
