No...the response is wonky, circular, and misleading. It also
implies that, by simplifying the issue to "more money for bikes" that
we don't know what we're talking about. I am meeting with them
tomorrow to discuss funding and I'll be bringing up the letter.
This letter promises nothing and basically says that they think they
are already spending enough money.
-Dar
At 07:00 PM 11/6/2006, Torrey wrote:
Hello,
So did I get a good or bad response? I can't tell. Is this as good
as a promise to restore funding?
Torrey
Here is the response from DOT Secretary Frank J. Busalacchi:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you for your recent e-mail regarding funding for bicycle and
pedestrian facilities in the state. Governor Doyle and I share a
vision of a safe, efficient, and balanced statewide transportation
system for all of Wisconsin's citizens. That includes bicycle and
pedestrian facilities.
From your letter and many others I have received as well as through
recent media reports, it is clear that the interest in bicycle and
pedestrian facilities is impassioned. However, I have also noted
that there is a considerable amount of misinformation and
misunderstanding as well, especially in the areas of federal
funding, state budgets, and project selections.
There are numerous federal programs that pertain to
transportation. When discussing bicycle and pedestrian facilities,
the Transportation Enhancements Program is probably the most
notable, but certainly not the only source.
You may be surprised that there is actually no federal funding
provided specifically for the Transportation Enhancements
Program. Rather, as with all other formula based federal
transportation programs, the federal transportation act provides a
maximum amount that may be spent for eligible activities in the
Transportation Enhancements Program, but no actual
funding. Instead, federal formula funding is provided to each state
in a lump sum for the state to allocate depending on the needs in
that state. Another important issue is that the federal funding
lump sum equals only 85 to 90 percent of the total of all of the
federal program maximums.
The Governor, with assistance from the Department, prepares a budget
request, but, in Wisconsin, the State Legislature makes final
decisions on the allocation of federal funding in the biennial
budget process. Once the budget becomes law, the Department must
spend federal funding as directed in the budget. For example, in
the 2003-05 biennial budget, the State Legislature eliminated
funding for the Surface Transportation Discretionary Program, a key
program for bicycle and pedestrian facilities. In the 2005-07
biennial budget, Governor Doyle, recognizing the shortage of funding
for such activities, wanted funding for the program restored and
included it in his budget request. However, the State Legislature
again eliminated funding for the program.
Another common bit of misinformation is that Wisconsin only spends
about 30 percent of available federal Transportation Enhancements
funding. First, the state does not receive any specific funding for
the Transportation Enhancements Program. The maximum is actually
what we can spend on Enhancement eligible projects, not just through
the Enhancement program.
Additional federal funding is spent on Transportation Enhancements
projects in other state programs. In state fiscal year 2005, the
state spent $14.6 million on federal Transportation Enhancements
projects about half of which were in the state Transportation
Enhancements Program and half in the State Highway Program. That
equals over 78 percent of the federal maximum, more than double the
30 percent recently quoted.
In fact, over the past six years, the range of spending on federal
Transportation Enhancements activities has ranged from $8.7 million
to $14.6 million annually, or about 52 to 78 percent of the federal
maximums. Plus, additional state and federal funds are spent each
year on bicycle and pedestrian facilities, such as separate bike
lanes, wider, paved shoulders, and sidewalks, as part of highway
projects with additional funding spent in other programs as well.
Yet another issue is that the Transportation Enhancements Program
funds much more than bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Other
federally eligible activities include streetscaping, lighting, and
historical transportation facilities. Which projects that are picked
to be funded is decided by a selection committee of 13 individuals,
including state legislators, representatives from state agencies,
local officials, and stakeholders, including the Bicycle Federation
of Wisconsin. Several of the projects picked this year by the
committee were not bicycle projects. Also, if additional funding
became available there is no guarantee the money would be applied
toward bicycle activities. Again, this would be up to the committee
to decide which programs were to be funded.
Another issue that limits funding for bicycle and pedestrian
projects are federal earmarks. As noted in many reports, the
current local Transportation Enhancements Program cycle was
programmed at about $9 million, or $3.5 million lower than funding
made available for the program in the state budget. That $3.5
million "reduction" is due entirely to federal earmarks for bicycle
and pedestrian facilities. These federal earmarks did not provide
any additional funding to the state, but, because they are federally
earmarked, they are mandated and must be funded before other
projects, regardless of their priority or importance compared to
other projects applied for through the program.
Again, thank you for your interest in bicycle and pedestrian
facilities in Wisconsin. I hope I was able to clear up some of the
misunderstanding and misinformation that is circulating regarding
funding for those facilities. I also want to reiterate that bicycle
and pedestrian facilities are an important part of the state's
transportation system, for recreation, mobility, and access to
jobs. As Governor Doyle develops his transportation budget request,
all modes, including bicycle and pedestrian, will be considered in
meeting the transportation needs of Wisconsin's citizens within the
constraints of scarce resources.
If you have additional questions or thoughts on this or any other
transportation issue, please contact my office.
Sincerely,
Frank J. Busalacchi
Secretary
> -------Original Message-------
> From: Michael D. Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Bikies] Trail Funding Action Alert Reminder
> Sent: 01 Nov '06 21:07
>
> Oh man. Time for some Poli Sci 101.
>
> Folks, this isn't a mechanical exercise, except inasmuch as DOT is a
> *political* machine. And as one of the dead Kennedys once said,
> politics ain't mechanical, its chemical. That is, don't expect
> instantaneous results but use every opportunity to influence the
> system; election season is high season for getting one's input into
> the system. Furthermore:
>
> A) It isn't a matter of whether anything changes in reality between
> now and Nov 7, it is a matter of wringing a promise out of them which
> can be used against them at a later date. This works as often as it
> doesn't (remember, its chemical, not mechanical) but at least there
> is a decent *chance* of getting something good, in terms of a
> promise, out of them just before an election. Then, yes of course, it
> is a matter of "keep[ing] up the pressure." As someone who has been
> heavily involved in bike/ped/transit advocacy and political campaigns
> for lo these past 16+ years, this is hardly a new concept to me.
> Election season is merely a critical juncture that should be taken
> advantage of rather than waiting til 7 days afterward.
>
> B) The DOT Sec'y is a *political* appointee. It is *NOT* a civil
> service job! In fact, it has long been the plummiest of plum jobs for
> any governor's (Dem or Rep) fat cat cronies. Getting your letter in
> now, cc'ing the Governor and the rest of the world (good suggestion
> that!) could have a much bigger impact than waiting to a point that
> leaves your letter 4 years out from the next election.
>
> C) Is it a certainty? No way.
>
> D) I never said give up. Dunno where that came from. I'm merely
> suggesting that using the election season as a great big lever (or
> cudgel, pick your weapon) might be a good thing. This election is
> tightening up. Even the Dems are figuring out the concept of
> micro-casting--who knows they might pick up on this wavelength.
> Again, no certainties, but it is always worth a try.
> -Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bikies mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies
>
Dar Ward
Executive Director
Bicycle Federation of Wisconsin
106 E. Doty Street, Suite 400
P.O. Box 1224
Madison, WI 53701-1224
Phone: 608-251-4456
Fax: 608-251-4594
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: www.bfw.org
The Bicycle Federation of Wisconsin is a proud member of Community
Shares of Wisconsin, and Community Shares of Greater Milwaukee
Bike for Wisconsin Ride, September 17, 2006, Cedarburg, WI
Saris Gala, October 20, 2006, Madison, WI
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies
