Out of curiosity, since I work at off-hours, where and
when are the bike paths and routes most crowded?
(Besides coffee shops, small groceries and book
stores?)

Also, if the lanes are crowded, is bike traffic
bumber-to-bumper?
Would occasional passing lanes be practical every two
blocks; which raises the issue - is passing on the
right still legal? (Although, having stop lights on
the entrance ramps on the busy bike path like there
are on the Beltline would be a clear signal how
serious Madison takes its bike commuting. ;-))

Are there alternative streets to use for a block or
two? Ort just maybe stop by the nearest beverage stand
to wait out the bike rush with a sugar rush?

OK, I'll be quiet now.

DJ 

--- "Paul T. O'Leary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Topic creep alert!
> 
> > From: Robbie Webber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 
> > I'd love to hear an afternoon report during peak
> hour. That is often the 
> > time when the paths are so crowded in good weather
> that we really do 
> > have to slow down or take another route. I can't
> complain, because it's 
> > great that so many people are walking, running,
> strolling, biking, 
> > commuting, shopping, or otherwise enjoying the
> paths. But sometimes I 
> > really do stay off of them because of
> "congestion."
> 
> Congestion? Well, let's just pave more lanes!
> 
> I know, we're all accustomed to cringing at the idea
> of paving our way out of congestion. But why is it
> never considered for bike routes? Often when I'm on
> the bike path, seeing (and sometimes being part of)
> near head-on collisions as some users pass others,
> it occurs to me, would this be acceptable on a car
> thoroughfare? Isn't the textbook response, after the
> first head-on, to "improve" the road to two lanes in
> each direction? This further gets me wondering, why
> aren't there "2+2"-lane bike paths, where traffic
> volume calls for it? Or roads with two bike lanes in
> each direction? Seems to me this would be a safer
> thing than just making the path wider overall. At
> what point do traffic volumes drive construction of
> more path lanes, the way traffic volumes drive
> construction of more car lanes?
> 
> ---------------
> Paul T. O'Leary
> Desktop Insurgent
> Madison, WI USA
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bikies mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies
> 

_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies

Reply via email to