As many people know, the city of Madison has this ridiculous policy of 
prohibiting parking on one side of the street between 1 a.m. and 7 a.m.from 
November to April  The alleged justification is to facilitate snow plowing on 
the couple of days a year when the city undertakes a "general plowing."  The 
rest of the time the only activity is motor-driven parking cops driving around 
looking for cars that happen to be on the "wrong" side of the road.

The fine for being on the "wrong" side of the road is $20, if paid in the first 
couple of days, and goes up to $30 soon thereafter.

The downtown area is exempt, and moving cars there is only necessary during 
"snow emergencies."  Why not convert the entire city to a "snow emergency" 
zone?  I think the reason is that the city generates a large chunk of revenue 
from those caught by this policy.

Even more interesting, the one time the city did a "general plowing" in the 
recent past, the parking monitors did NOT ticket wrong-side parkers, and it 
caused problems on my street at least.  Again, what is the purpose of this 
policy?  The official city policy, as relayed by Ald. Judy Olson, is that it is 
important to have this policy in place for clearing the streets the one or two 
times a year general plowings occur.  Wouldn't it make more sense to switch the 
entire city to a "snow emergency" rule and up the fines for those who don't 
move their cars on plowing nights?  (I noticed Chicago, for instance, has signs 
on streets saying something like "move your car if it snows two inches.")

Having made a short story long, I am requesting info on how much pollution is 
emitted by starting a car engine and then shutting it off 30 seconds after the 
car is moved across the street?  Since I don't own a car, I am not personally 
affected, but plan to attempt to get the city to amend this obsolete policy, 
because of the unnecessary global warming emissions and because the policy 
seems to be discriminatory against the denser near-downtown, i.e., yet another 
city policy favoring suburban areas.

I would be curious to know what percentage of the registrations ticketed come 
from near-downtown areas, where there are more rentals and two-unit 
conversions, and virtually no two-car-wide driveways and other amenities that 
make this policy less of a problem in more suburban areas.  Plus near-downtown 
areas have a much higher percentage of people who use means other than their 
own motor vehicle to transport themselves, and may not remember to move their 
vehicle to the other side of the street when they get back for the night.

Feedback encouraged.

tim
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies

Reply via email to