Monica brings up some excellent comments about why the downtown corridor might 
be missing a lot of what families want in their housing needs, not to mention 
the significant number of affordable housing alternatives not too distant from 
the downtown (and remember not everyone works downtown...sprawl has been caused 
by the new job nodes that have spread around the perimeter of Madison like 
wildfire in the last 5-10 years).
  
When a similar proposal of figuring out how to get more families downtown and 
pursue a school were brought up during conversations with projects in City 
Committees and the City's Downtown Coordiniating Committee, of which I'm a 
member of and also the chair of the "Living Downtown/Land Use" 
subcommittee...it was clear that the reality of the marketplace and 
demographics, and the goal, to bring more families to live downtown, new school 
etc did not really connect. Look at the attached link to census data and notice 
that the three main downtown census districts..16.01 and .02 and 17.01 have 
less than 1.5% of aged 17 and under residents;
  
http://www.ci.madison.wi.us/planning/unit_planning/census/2000/Table03_2000_ct.pdf
   
  Should we be planning policy that is more in tune with market realities?  Or 
creating policy that fits the problem...that's my vote.
  
Should we be discussing Impact fees for education on all new suburbs that have 
been the main genesis for the education cost pressures for schools, especially 
on the south and southwest sides?  Why should developers be obligated to pay 
for roads, sewers, intersections, police, fire and parks...but not schools?  It 
would even be a win win...if those who created the "impact" paid the fees, 
let's say making the homes $5kish more expensive as a result, then the 
residents who move there would have better funded schools...or might be more 
inclined to save some money and move into more established school 
areas...reducing sprawl.  
   
  In the end, Madison, as much as people like to complain that it isn't 
affordable actually is, just not all in the downtown...for a city our size and 
with the accoutrements that we have, it's amazing that the average cost of a 
home is slightly above national averages.  Always remember that statistics can 
be misused...as D'israeli was famous for saying...but in our community's 
case...we have much to be thankful for.
   
  And, oh by the way, don't even get me started with the overblown "perception" 
of bad traffic here....people from other cities think we're crazy when they 
hear that.  Let's get more bike lanes in the right places, improve Metro with 
park and rides and look into light rail...the new trolley around downtown plan 
doesn't solve anything to do with traffic jams....let's buy all those downtown 
dwellers it helps free bus passes or free bikes instead...it would be much 
cheaper. (although I LOVE the idea of redirecting the bus's off of state 
street...they operate fine on the spoke streets as the construction of blocks 
in the last few years has shown)
   
  What we really need to do is use TIF to create more employment in our center 
core and entertainment/shopping options, rather than losing those jobs to our 
suburban competitors (doesn't it feel like we're just now getting to the 
suburbanization of the Rust belt cities that hit everywhere else a decade or 
two or three ago?) or elsewhere...Central park would be well funded if it 
included a couple of thousand jobs around it....the Overture would be great if 
it was smack dab in the middle of an Cultural Arts District that brought us a 
new Central Library, New State Museum, 1st Run Film Cineplex, Arts Incubator 
and more residential to help the numbers work...diversifying the draw, and the 
affordability of the draws-have you seen Overture prices?- for downtown.   
Wouldn't it be swell to ride the bike or take the bus for dinner and a movie 
rather than have to shoot out to the far west/east/fitchburgsides?...other 
similar cities have used this strategy to great effect and it would
 help make our downtown more "adult" and thus even more attractive for infill 
residential...which is what we all want to see.
   
  Random thoughts of a crazed ex council candidate, and I agree to disagree, 
and will attempt to do so civilly...what kind of world would this be if we 
always agreed?  Boring that's what...and Madison sure ain't boring.

Troy Thiel


_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies

Reply via email to