At 3:23 PM -0700 4/24/07, Troy Thiel wrote: > >Should we be discussing Impact fees for education on all new suburbs that >have been the main genesis for the education cost pressures for schools, >especially on the south and southwest sides? Why should developers be >obligated to pay for roads, sewers, intersections, police, fire and >parks...but not schools?
Troy, I'm all in favor of school impact fees, but state law prohibits it. I'm not sure of the motivation, but I'd guess the developers would be pretty unhappy about adding to their costs. I have no idea why some elected officials promote residential development as being good for the local economy - it creates a major unfunded mandate. -darin -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Darin Burleigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Bikies mailing list [email protected] http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies
