Guys, be reasonable, if they are annoucing the closure of the path, all
the design work is done and the contract has been bid. If the issues you
are bringing up have not been dealt with by now, it is a bit late. 
 
Ann M. Freiwald, ASLA
 

________________________________

From: Tim Wong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 4:05 PM
To: Robbie Webber; Arthur Ross
Cc: [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Bikies] Isthmus Path Closure Blount to Paterson Aug 6 -20


I second Robbie's suggestion; at that very intersection not too long
ago, the bump was so hard (hit at relatively high speed) that my bike
basket came disconnected.  Although the gridmeisters always get mad at
me for suggesting it, I think Livingston and Brearly should be
cul-de-sac'd before crossing the tracks.  This would save the city
$300,000 or so in RR gate crossings, and because Brearly and Livingston
both don't go through at East Wash, they clearly aren't through streets.
 
"No nation can preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare."
--James Madison, April 20, 1795 


>>> Robbie Webber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 8/1/2007 3:52 PM >>>

Arthur and Larry -

This means that we have another wonderful opportunity to implement a 
request that has been hanging out there for years:

On the minor streets that cross the Isthmus Path, raise the path up so 
it runs level as it crosses the street. This would accomplish several 
things.

1. Elimination of the curb cuts, changes in level, and therefore jarring

as bicyclists cross Livingston. This can be especially bad at higher 
speeds or with a trailer.

2. Clear definition of the path for cross traffic. This will be another 
way to highlight that the path exists, and cross traffic needs to be 
careful as they cross.

3. A speed hump would be created for cross traffic, thereby helping with

traffic calming as Livingston cross the path.

4. Since the Isthmus Path probably carries more traffic than Livingston,

it is the major street vs. Livingston. Therefore Livingston traffic 
would logically yield if there was a traffic control. The 
hump/prominence of the path would help define that Livingston traffic 
needs to slow and yield.

If raising the path at this location is impossible - although it would 
seem a minor modification - at least the path crossing should be 
reconstructed with some other clear markings such as colored concrete, 
scoring, or other well defined markings.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

-- Robbie
Ross, Arthur wrote:
> See below for a news release on the closure of the Isthmus section of
> the Capital City Path between Blount and Paterson.  The closure is for
> the reconstruction of the path crossing at Livingston Street as part
of
> the reconstruction of Livingston between the path and Williamson
Street
> that has be occurring this summer.  The closure will begin Monday
August
> 6th and last up to 2 weeks.
>   

_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies

_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies

Reply via email to