Dear Kirk and Richard,

As I have said in so many way, I am against gastopo-styled land use
planning which takes the ideas of a few and forces them  on the many,
stealing land or land  rights in the process.  That is how I perceive
"SMART GROWTH."  But maybe smart growth means only an  ADVISORY stance?
If that is the case, I am all for it.  But when it is "handed down and
enforced by the STATE--that is opposed by the FARM BUREAU FEDERATION and
I would expect any other "property-owners" groups.

It was easy for "like minded" groups wishing to live in "social
experiments" to fulfill their dreams in our Westward expansion during
the first half of the Nineteenth Century.  Followers of Charles Fourier,
a French Government clerk with social organization ideas, chartered and
settled Ceresco, adjacent to Ripon.  The Frenchman's ideas were
interpreted through H. Greeley and Brisbane after Fourier's death and
these Phalanx settlements were in a number of American and French
locations, most notable was Brook Farm in Massachusettes.   Utopian
ideas of the few were put into practice for factory workers and others
during the same historic period.

But these "smart uses" were not imposed on others and did not
disadvantage anybody.  They did not steal the land rights of one group
and "reform" land ownership at the behest of any "pressure advocacy
group."

Wisconsin is nearly all "inter-urban."  "Suburbs without bicycle access"
must account for few Wisconsin residents.  I would figure that if there
is not easy bicycle access that bicycle commuters would simply NOT BUY
HOUSES  in these areas and would rather live on a grid in the Isthmus.
That is called BUYERS CHOICE.  I thought that the arguments surrounding
choice were fought during the life of Milton Friedman, the greatest
economist of the Twentieth Century.  These days the old USSR residents
are experiencing "choice" and not simply "correct" goods determined by
"smart" committees of commissars and sub commissars.

Again, Richard has caught my main theme.  That is to PROMOTE THE
BICYCLE  which I feel has been in the decline because of  yet to be
identified systemic reasons, and riders will chose politicians who
understand a need for signage in the country and trails in congested
areas.

Eric Westhagen

_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies

Reply via email to