>
In Message 6 Dar wrote:
> Mike:
> Can you say how many votes the candidates who got elected got? Or at least the top vote getter and the bottom vote getter of those who made it? It would be interesting to know if the write-ins had a high or low percent of the vote (i.e. if the top vote getter had 200 votes...50/200=25%....but if the top vote getter had 80 votes...that's a different thing).
Aaron and Joel each received 332 votes. The incumbents on the "official" slate received:
Eric Schramm, 273; Chick Veenstra, 272; Ken Bates, 276.
This came from the press release Dar cited in message 1. It does not give the total number of votes cast, but the lower winning vote totals for the incumbents, suggest (not surprisingly) that people who wrote in other candidates most likely voted for the two new members, and not for one or more of the incumbents. Others may simply have voted for fewer than five candidates.
Note, fwiw, that Pam received slightly more than just the 56-60 difference between Aaron/Joel and the incumbents, so some people may have cast entirely write-in ballots. Other variations, of course, are possible.
http://www.bfw.org/newsletters/BFWBoardofDirectorsElectionsResults.pdf
Now go have a beer,
Bob Paolino
"Are Canadians just Americans who carry hockey
sticks instead of guns,
or is there more to it than that?"
--"This Canadian Existence"
Wisconsin Public Radio
( ) ASCII ribbon campaign
X against HTML e-mail:
/ \ Friends don't send friends HTML-bloated messages!
A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top-posting frowned upon?
_______________________________________________ Bikies mailing list [email protected] http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies
