While I am on the subject of dealing with the decrease in gas tax
revenue, USDOT has released a plan to deal with the situation:

http://www.fightgridlocknow.gov/index.htm
(The word "bicycle" is entirely absent from the materials on the site.)

I would note that a key focus is on "dealing with congestion" as opposed
to simple maintenance. It occurs to me that a congestion-centric focus
is obsolete in these times of safer roads and less traffic.

The video on the home page is a real hoot.  In it, Mary Peters suggests
that reducing our fossil fuel dependence somehow hinges on utilizing
private sources of funding for highway projects.  I guess if you believe
that the amount of fossil fuel consumed by congestion, if saved, would
be sufficient to give us energy independence, then this makes sense.
The problem is that historically, increased capacity has lead to
increased driving and fuel consumption via a phenomenon called
"triple-convergence".

And one more tidbit I'd love to know more about:

Why is the highway trust fund going to run dry in 2009, yet there's $8
billion sitting there unused in the transit fund?  We have news reports
of overloaded transit systems and it seems the feds are dragging their
feet on funding the improvements to make mass transit in this country
more efficient.


_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies

Reply via email to