I believe that the bike trail along the rail corridor between the Village of 
Shorewood Hills and Middleton could be constructed in 2013 - 2014, if there was 
support.  Thus far, we have some interest expressed by Middleton staff but we 
are lacking the biking support we enjoyed for the SW Bike Trail Missing Link.  
Compromise does not build bike paths...
 
 

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Doug Adler
Sent: Wed 11/19/2008 16:18
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Bikies] Bikies Digest, Vol 56, Issue 22


I disagree.  While rail trails are great, University sorely needs some bike/ped 
improvements.  There are stretches of nice path along there, but the bike route 
detours in a few sections are ridiculous if you are commuting or trying to get 
to a business along University versus taking a liesurely weekend ride.  And 
just continuing those existing multi-use paths along University is no good due 
to the number of dangerous road & driveway crossings.  Bike lanes in those 
sections connecting the existing paths would seem a good compromise.  

I like arterials for the same reason motorists do - they are usually the most 
direct route, and there aren't stop signs every few blocks. 

If it were a real, immediate either-or choice I might think differently, but 
right now the tantalizing possibility of a nearby rail trail in some distant 
future isn't enough to convince me not to spend money on bike lanes. 

And on that report, it would seem to me that "provision of separate cycling 
facilities" would include marked bike lanes.   While no doubt completely 
separate is better, it's rarely practical and even more rarely actually pulled 
off.. 

-Doug Adler






________________________________


Subject: 
RE: [Bikies] University Avenue lane re: encouraging cycling
From: 
"Schimpff, Jeff A - DNR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Date: 
Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:26:11 -0600
To: 
"Nelson, Larry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> , "[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]" <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <mailto:[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> 
To: 
"Nelson, Larry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> , "[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]" <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <mailto:[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> 

        Indeed, the rail route would be infinitely preferable to biking along 
University Avenue.  Over time, pedaling on a high-traffic roadway like that 
does cause respiratory damage, not to mention the moral distress it causes to 
see so many people yakking alone on their cell phones.  The rail route provides 
a healthy separation from traffic pollution and a scenic boost to the psyche. 
If rail transit ever emerges, then the engines will need to be all-electric, 
rather than diesel electric, to protect trail users' health.  It is overall 
cleaner as well as lower-carbon and more energy efficient to run a train on 
electricity produced at the Walnut Street plant than by a diesel engine, even 
if it ran on biodiesel.
         
        It would be great to team up with Middleton and Dane County at the same 
time, and extend a path all the way to Deming Way, and then connect across Hwy 
14 to the Hwy 12 path (as much as I denigrate its proximity to Hwy 12, that 
junction could be the site of a successful "Park and Bike" for our daily guests 
from Cross Plains and Sauk Prairie, the next time oil prices leap to record 
levels).
         

        Jeff Schimpff 
        Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources 
        Madison, WI 
        608-267-7853 
        "Bus, Bike, Carpool to Work for Clean Air for Kids" 

         


________________________________

                From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
Nelson, Larry
                Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 8:01 AM
                To: Meiers, Steve; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                Subject: RE: [Bikies] encouraging cycling
                
                
                "The key to achieving high levels of cycling appears to be the 
provision of separate cycling facilities along heavily travelled roads and at 
intersections, combined with traffic calming of most residential 
neighbourhoods."
                 
                I believe that we have reached the same conclusion but we 
continue to add bike lanes on arterial streets rather than provide separate 
cycling facilities.  Case in Point:  we are required to add bike lanes on 
University Avenue between Segoe and Allen (scheduled for 2011).  To do so will 
require the acquistion of right of way, which will be quite costly.  Those 
resources could be better spent on a separate facility, such as the 
construction of a bike path on the rail corridor about a 1/2 mile to the south. 
 Now that facility would get people out of SOVs.

________________________________

                From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
Meiers, Steve
                Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 7:48 AM
                To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                Subject: [Bikies] encouraging cycling
                
                
                
This is in a British Journal Transportation Review- you may be able to get a 
copy of it through your local library.
 
 
Journal Article
Making Cycling Irresistible: Lessons From The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany. 
Pucher J, Buehler R. Transp Rev 
<http://www.safetylit.org/week/journalpage.php?jid=6004>  2008; 28(4): 495-528. 
DOI: 10.1080/01441640701806612 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01441640701806612>    
  What is this? <http://www.safetylit.org/definitions.htm#doi>  
(Copyright © 2008, Taylor and Francis Group)    
This article shows how the Netherlands, Denmark and Germany have made bicycling 
a safe, convenient and practical way to get around their cities. The analysis 
relies on national aggregate data as well as case studies of large and small 
cities in each country. The key to achieving high levels of cycling appears to 
be the provision of separate cycling facilities along heavily travelled roads 
and at intersections, combined with traffic calming of most residential 
neighbourhoods. Extensive cycling rights of way in the Netherlands, Denmark and 
Germany are complemented by ample bike parking, full integration with public 
transport, comprehensive traffic education and training of both cyclists and 
motorists, and a wide range of promotional events intended to generate 
enthusiasm and wide public support for cycling. In addition to their many 
pro-bike policies and programmes, the Netherlands, Denmark and Germany make 
driving expensive as well as inconvenient in central cities through a host of 
taxes and restrictions on car ownership, use and parking. Moreover, strict 
land-use policies foster compact, mixed-use developments that generate shorter 
and thus more bikeable trips. It is the coordinated implementation of this 
multi-faceted, mutually reinforcing set of policies that best explains the 
success of these three countries in promoting cycling. For comparison, the 
article portrays the marginal status of cycling in the UK and the USA, where 
only about 1% of trips are by bike. 

Language: Eng

                 
                Steve Meiers
                Safety educator
                (608) 267-1102
                [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                 

        
________________________________


        _______________________________________________
        Bikies mailing list
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        http://www.danenet.org/mailman/listinfo/bikies

_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org

Reply via email to