I completely agree with rpaolino on the unfair method of taxation for public
amenities like sidewalks, and I agree that the opposition to this sidewalk is
probably just a financial consideration. Indeed, if the real issue here is how
to pay for the public improvement, those in oppostion should be more direct and
oppose the taxation and not the sidewalk. Their sign should be changed from "NO
SIDEWALK" to "NO TAXATION OF SIDEWALKATION" or something like that. :)
The city must change this ridiculous taxation policy. Partially paying for
sidewalk and curb/gutter improvements can easily reach into the thousands of
dollars for each property owner who has the misfortune of owning the property
adjacent to these public improvements.
When neighborhoods band together to oppose sidewalks, it shows just how bad the
outcome can be and sets a terrible precedent for future sidewalk
considerations. Sidewalks are the conduit to our life-blood of community
togetherness and environmental independence.
-John Jacobs
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
