There are "at construction-time" details missing. These kinds of details
(and I can only hazard a few as they spring to mind) deserve development in
an SDEIS/DEIS, a hearing with public comment, and refinement before a FEIS. 

The public is left to ad-hoc "solutions" to design and construction problems
that arise during the chaos of construction. Surely there are standards and
best practices which can be identified in advance? Detours are one such
problem which can be addressed now.

A driver of a motor vehicle is considerably less inconvenienced by urban
detours than are pedestrians and bicyclists. With this in mind, I have some
questions:
1.      Where will detours be placed?
2.      What existing paths, sidewalks, signals, signage, enforcement,
streets and lanes will be upgraded to accommodate the official and
unofficial detours?
3.      Is there an acceptable detour distance for all transportation users?
How does a pedestrian or bicyclist bypass a missing intersection or bridge? 
4.      Is it fair to remove a pedestrian overpass (for example) and cause
that person on foot to walk additional 1/2-miles, 1-miles, or further to
reach their destination? 
5.      What is considered when detours are selected? Safety? Inconvenience?
Barriers? Transit options? Pollution? Noise? Rain water runoff? 

An entire section of the SDEIS/DEIS seems to be missing! Answers to these,
and other construction-time details should be addressed in the SDEIS/DEIS.
An example illustrates my point: I bring these elements up now because they
plainly were lost when the details of construction were planned for the Park
Street / Highway 12-14-18 / Rimrock Road / Badger Road overpass construction
project in 2010. The situation is cruel to the people who live and commute
in the area. It is a lesson to be learned from and to not repeat.

The Badger pedestrian/bicycle overpass traffic did not have a pedestrian or
bicycle detour. The unofficial detour is the Rimrock Road bridge. This
bridge lacks sidewalks on both sides of Rimrock Road. None of the signals
contain pedestrian actuator buttons. South-bound pedestrian/bicycle traffic
cannot see the motor vehicle signal lights. And there is no signage or
warning indicators to motor vehicles of increased pedestrian or bicycle use.
The "detour" is 1-1/2 miles out of the way, a complete barrier to most
pedestrian travel. The speed of motor vehicles (coming off or going onto
freeway ramps) is so fast as to make the sidewalks and bike lanes hazardous.
Freeway interchange projects inconvenience all modes of transportation. Yet
somehow the pedestrian and bicyclist was overlooked and omitted from the
detour planning on the Park Street / Beltline / Highway 12-14-18
interchange. Had the project included safety upgrades to Rimrock Road for
proposed pedestrian / bicycle detours, these problems would have been
minimized or avoided.
Regrettably, there is no construction detour plan in the SDEIS/DEIS to
assist the public understand construction-time impacts and what upgrades
need to be made in advance.

Besides construction-time planning (detours are but the most obvious
example), there are other details omitted from the SDEIS/DEIS (which may be
covered by design standards or regulations, but not obvious in their
applicability or implementation on Verona Road).  

Some of these details are often the most important element from the
perspective of a human being on foot or riding a bicycle. So, do not lose
sight of these essentials:
1.      All signals provided to include pedestrian actuator buttons and
crosswalks to be clearly visible to motor vehicles. Can I see what the
designers propose so I can comment on it?
2.      Sidewalks and crosswalks available on all sides and for all
directions of travel?
3.      Pedestrian and bicyclist lanes, crossings, refuge islands, etc.
visible from all directions?


---
"Comments on the SDEIS are encouraged from all members of the public and are
due by Friday, December 17, 2010."
http://www.dot.wisconsin.gov/projects/d1/verona/index.htm These are comments
on the supplemental and draft environmental impact statement (SDEIS/DEIS)
reports for the Dane County US 18/151 (Verona Road) corridor. I've edited
these down to bite size quick reads...
---

_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org

Reply via email to