Would that be death by second-hand texting? And eventually then would cell-phone be banned from public places like smoking whence avowed cell phone uesers will leave the premises in order to find out the box scores from the latest game (or reality show)? Or will public establishments install an outdoor patio for those who insist on cell-phoning? Curious minds want to know before they are irretrievable irradiated.
--- On Wed, 6/1/11, S. Morris Rose <[email protected]> wrote: From: S. Morris Rose <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Bikies] Fwd: Breaking News: Cellphones are possibly carcinogenic to human's, agency says To: "tim wong" <[email protected]> Cc: "bikies" <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, June 1, 2011, 2:01 AM On 5/31/2011 11:45 PM, tim wong wrote: > “Cellphones may cause brain tumors One of the problems with dismissing the health risks of cellphone use is that it's not a risk that's borne by the user alone. A problem is that if you are in a location-- such as a bus-- where many people are simultaneously using their phones, users and non-users alike, including infants and children and pregnant mothers, can be bathed in an RF environment that exceeds exposure standards by several times. Exposure standards that we are now learning are too low. Seems to me that a reasonable countermeasure would be to jam the signals as soon as a radiation threshold is met, but that wouldn't be legal. Here's a link to a more-or-less random relevant research abstract just to demonstrate that, unlike most of my posts, this isn't a raw troll: http://news.nuclear.com/index.php/cell-phone-radiation-levels-in Me, I'm staying at home until the cellphone craze inevitably passes. -- S. Morris Rose West Point Grey, Vancouver BC _______________________________________________ Bikies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
_______________________________________________ Bikies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
