Hello everyone - Regarding Ride The Drive public feedback... I am meeting
with one of the Mayor's Assistants this afternoon and will ask her about
timing for public comment. I'll be in touch.

Amanda
________________________
Amanda White
Associate Director
Bicycle Federation of Wisconsin
(608) 251-4456
[email protected]
www.bfw.org


On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 3:39 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Send Bikies mailing list submissions to
>        [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Bikies digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Bicycling in Mississippi ([email protected])
>   2. Re: Bicycling in Mississippi ([email protected])
>   3. Re: Ride the Drive (Brenda Konkel)
>   4. Re: 5 (nancy griswold)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:34:56 -0400
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Bikies] Bicycling in Mississippi
> Message-ID:
>        <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
>
> >From the linked article (Allgood is the DA):
>
> "Allgood says he has seen the Highway Patrol accident report and there was
> no felony because the motorist didn't leave the scene, wasn't impaired,
> and didn't intentionally or negligently hit Morgan."
>
> If she got out and saw the cyclist, then got back in her car and started
> it up, what could she possibly have intended to do besides 1) leave the
> scene or 2) strike the cyclist again ?
>
> -Mindy
>
> > a story from Mississippi.
> >
> >
> > she was charged with misdemeanor
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: James Daniel <[email protected]>
> > Date: Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:31
> > Subject: Re: [Tri] Just sad!
> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> >
> >
> > Running over the cyclist after the initial incident would have to be at
> > least assault with a deadly weapon.  I see these as two separate actions.
> > The motorist stopped.  Got out of the vehicle.  Ran over the cyclist
> > again.*
> > ***
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > WTF!****
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > Police report:****
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > THE CYCLIST WAS WEST BOUND ON MS50 NEAR THE TRULOVE LOOP INTERSECTION. V1
> > WAS WEST BOUND ON MS50 APPROACHING THE CYCLIST FROM THE REAR. THE FRONT
> OF
> > V1 COLLIDED WITH THE REAR OF THE BICYCLE. THE IMPACT THREW THE CYCLIST
> > INTO
> > THE AIR BEFORE LANDING ON THE HOOD OF V1 AND ONTO THE WINDSHIELD. V1
> > CONTINUED FOR A FEW FEET BEFORE COMING TO A STOP. THE CYCLIST WAS THEN
> > THROWN TO THE ASPHALT WHEN V1 STOPPED. THE DRIVER OF V1 EXITED THE
> VEHICLE
> > AND OBSERVED THE CYCLIST WHILE TALKING ON THE PHONE. D1 THEN REENTERED
> HER
> > VEHICLE AND RAN THE CYCLIST OVER AGAIN BEFORE BEING FORCED FROM HER
> > VEHICLE
> > BY WITNESSES. V1 CAME TO FINAL REST FACING WEST IN THE WEST BOUND LANE ON
> > MS
> > 50 JUST METERS WEST OF THE TRULOVE LOOP INTERSECTION. THE CYCLIST CAME TO
> > FINAL REST NEAR THE RIGHT FRONT TIRE OF V1. ****
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > James Daniel****
> >
> > Systems Administrator II****
> >
> > iTech****
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of
> > *Raland
> > Burks
> > *Sent:* Thursday, June 23, 2011 10:03 AM
> > *To:* [email protected]
> > *Subject:* [Tri] Just sad!****
> >
> > ** **
> >
> >
> http://www.hattiesburgamerican.com/article/20110623/NEWS01/110623005/DA-No-felony-charges-injured-cyclist-case?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|FRONTPAGE
> > ****
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tri mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://mailman.usm.edu/mailman/listinfo/tri
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > "The system filters out the thoughtful and replaces them with the
> > faithful."  --quoted in John Dower, *Cultures of War*
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bikies mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:37:39 -0500
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Bikies] Bicycling in Mississippi
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes";
>        format="flowed"
>
>
> This article implies that the driver was not trying to flee, or
> intentionally strike cyclist:
>
>
> http://www.clarionledger.com/article/20110624/NEWS/106240339/Driver-who-struck-cyclist-won-t-face-felony-charges?odyssey=tab|mostpopular|text|FRONTPAGE
>
> "Norton got back in the car and apparently tried to move it out of
> traffic, but ran over Morgan again."
>
> So the second hit, like the first hit, was "an accident". Not
> "culpably negligent"? How careless do you have to be before you meet
> that criteria?
>
>
> Also, FTA:
> In his blog, Morgan says an amendment to the "3-foot law" is being
> drafted to be introduced by Rep. Margaret Ellis-Rogers, R-New Albany
>
>
>
> Quoting [email protected]:
> > From the linked article (Allgood is the DA):
> >
> > "Allgood says he has seen the Highway Patrol accident report and there
> was
> > no felony because the motorist didn't leave the scene, wasn't impaired,
> > and didn't intentionally or negligently hit Morgan."
> >
> > If she got out and saw the cyclist, then got back in her car and started
> > it up, what could she possibly have intended to do besides 1) leave the
> > scene or 2) strike the cyclist again ?
> >
> > -Mindy
> >
> >> a story from Mississippi.
> >>
> >>
> >> she was charged with misdemeanor
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> From: James Daniel <[email protected]>
> >> Date: Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:31
> >> Subject: Re: [Tri] Just sad!
> >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> >>
> >>
> >> Running over the cyclist after the initial incident would have to be at
> >> least assault with a deadly weapon.  I see these as two separate
> actions.
> >> The motorist stopped.  Got out of the vehicle.  Ran over the cyclist
> >> again.*
> >> ***
> >>
> >> ** **
> >>
> >> WTF!****
> >>
> >> ** **
> >>
> >> Police report:****
> >>
> >> ** **
> >>
> >> THE CYCLIST WAS WEST BOUND ON MS50 NEAR THE TRULOVE LOOP INTERSECTION.
> V1
> >> WAS WEST BOUND ON MS50 APPROACHING THE CYCLIST FROM THE REAR. THE FRONT
> OF
> >> V1 COLLIDED WITH THE REAR OF THE BICYCLE. THE IMPACT THREW THE CYCLIST
> >> INTO
> >> THE AIR BEFORE LANDING ON THE HOOD OF V1 AND ONTO THE WINDSHIELD. V1
> >> CONTINUED FOR A FEW FEET BEFORE COMING TO A STOP. THE CYCLIST WAS THEN
> >> THROWN TO THE ASPHALT WHEN V1 STOPPED. THE DRIVER OF V1 EXITED THE
> VEHICLE
> >> AND OBSERVED THE CYCLIST WHILE TALKING ON THE PHONE. D1 THEN REENTERED
> HER
> >> VEHICLE AND RAN THE CYCLIST OVER AGAIN BEFORE BEING FORCED FROM HER
> >> VEHICLE
> >> BY WITNESSES. V1 CAME TO FINAL REST FACING WEST IN THE WEST BOUND LANE
> ON
> >> MS
> >> 50 JUST METERS WEST OF THE TRULOVE LOOP INTERSECTION. THE CYCLIST CAME
> TO
> >> FINAL REST NEAR THE RIGHT FRONT TIRE OF V1. ****
> >>
> >> ** **
> >>
> >> James Daniel****
> >>
> >> Systems Administrator II****
> >>
> >> iTech****
> >>
> >> ** **
> >>
> >> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of
> >> *Raland
> >> Burks
> >> *Sent:* Thursday, June 23, 2011 10:03 AM
> >> *To:* [email protected]
> >> *Subject:* [Tri] Just sad!****
> >>
> >> ** **
> >>
> >>
> http://www.hattiesburgamerican.com/article/20110623/NEWS01/110623005/DA-No-felony-charges-injured-cyclist-case?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|FRONTPAGE
> >> ****
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Tri mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://mailman.usm.edu/mailman/listinfo/tri
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> "The system filters out the thoughtful and replaces them with the
> >> faithful."  --quoted in John Dower, *Cultures of War*
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Bikies mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bikies mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:06:32 -0500
> From: Brenda Konkel <[email protected]>
> To: Aaron Crandall <[email protected]>
> Cc: bikies <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Bikies] Ride the Drive
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I don't think that he said he has, I think he is planning to offer an
> invitation.  I don't think he knew the details.
> My guess is when he has a time and place for a meeting, all bikies, however
> they want to come forward, will be invited.  Just my guess tho.   He hasn't
> had the meeting with downtown residents yet either that I know, and I hope
> to be involved in that to discuss some of the absurdities around the one
> way
> streets and people being forced to drive down one way streets the wrong
> way.
>
> Brenda
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Aaron Crandall <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >  Mayor Soglin saif yesterday in his talk to the Capital Neighborhoods
> > that he was soliciting feedback from the community for continuing Ride
> the
> > Drive in the future, including feedback from local bikies. Does anyone
> know
> > who he's involved &/or been discussing the future of Ride the Drive? Just
> > curious... -Aaron
> >
> > *Join me in my efforts to support AIDS Network *by making a donation to
> my
> > ACT 9 bicycle ride in August, the Wisconsin AIDS Ride! *Click **HERE*<
> http://actride.kintera.org/faf/donorReg/donorPledge.asp?ievent=437316&lis=1&kntae437316=65FAB7DF3B5E497D81187CB49D95CF33&supId=239035567
> >
> > * for my donation page.* For more information on the ACT 9 ride, see
> > www.actride.org. Thank you.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bikies mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.danenet.org/private.cgi/bikies-danenet.org/attachments/20110624/c973ae1c/attachment.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 12:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
> From: nancy griswold <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected], [email protected],
>        [email protected],      [email protected], [email protected],
>        [email protected],    [email protected],
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Bikies] 5
> Message-ID:
>        <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Sex is the only satisfaction....
> http://gino-arte.net/best2011.php?tPage=12on4
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bikies mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org
>
>
> End of Bikies Digest, Vol 32, Issue 24
> **************************************
>
_______________________________________________
Bikies mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.danenet.org/listinfo.cgi/bikies-danenet.org

Reply via email to